Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
Quite simply, LOL
Well, most of the modern nation states have institutions which are based on roman models of law and government. Lot of invention of tradition never the less. USA just another state using enlightenment models of government. The problem with Roman history is that you are able to substantiate practically any model of government. Whether your interested in civil democracy or outright despotism and dictatorship, Rome has everything on offer. Gracchus or Theodoius the Great, everything is possible. Even Hitler was fascinated by Roman images and ideas of power. Not to mention mussolini. Were do you think the term 'Fascism' originates from: from the fasces, that, the reedbundles with axes carried by the lictores. A symbol of potestas (power). By the way, Republic is not the same as our modern understanding of the word republic. In Roman times it meant 'The common good' without the 'democratic' connotation. It was a oligarchy with collegiality and carefully instituted checks and balances between the different ordines (orders) and different types of citizens within the Roman Res Publicay. It was frail....and it was certainly not democratic. Our idea of democracy is a 18th and 19th century invention based on an ideal image of the Roman past.
The fact that an british company chooses a british accent for its Romans tells us something about modern culture. Clearly 'British language' is identified with 'imperialism' and 'cultural sophistication'.
There's your lecture
+1 Ive thought this since day one. Seems like they just had the employees do it. There's even a unit voice who sounds like that really annoying skinny, red headed, Brit from all their stupid update videos. Like, a "peasant" type unit.
RULE BRITANNIA BRITANNIA RULES THE ROMANS
not sure why everybody hates on american accents so much. sure the southern accent is horrible, but have you heard a Liverpool accent. is that even english they are speaking lol
Yes, yes it is english........
Nah, just messing with you :D
We don't know what any Latin accent sounded like. In fact, until relatively recently (a couple hundred years ago), we didn't even know how the Romans pronounced their words. Names like 'Caesar' and 'Cicero' were pronounced differently by scholars based on the country of the scholar's origin. In England you would pronounce them 'Seezer' and 'Sisserow', in Italy, 'Cheyzer' and 'Cheecherow', etc. Later, we discovered Greek transcriptions of known Latin names and works, which gave us a better understanding of Classical Latin pronunciation. I don't have a viable Greek font available right now, but essentially the Greek transcriptions spelled the names 'Kaisar' and 'Kikero', and since we *do* know how Classical Greek was pronounced, we were able to extrapolate Classical Latin pronunciation. But pronunciation and accent are two different (though related) concepts. You *need* living speakers (or at least audio recordings of living speakers) to know what an accent was like. We have nobody to tell us what accents existed in ancient Rome (and there were problably many. I'm sure that even after Oscan died as a language, the Samnites in Campania still had a hint of an Oscan accent to their Latin). So voice actors often portray Romans as having accents native to their own countries. When Americans portray Romans, it is usually with American accents (and rarely with pleasing results). When Englishmen portray Romans, it is usually with English accents (which I find sounds very nice).
One reason why I very much appreciate Romans being portrayed with English accents is because of the imperial association. Rome was the West's longest-reigning empire, and England/Britain was the world's largest empire. Both the names Rome and Britannia evoke thoughts of Empire when heard. So since we do not know the *real* accents used by Romans, the very imperial-sounding accents of the English work quite well, in my opinion. In fact, it is a common joke between my roommate and I that 'You must speak Latin like any true Roman would: with an English accent'
As for the Greeks, they definitely should not have the same accent as the Romans. What accent they *should* have, I don't know. But it definitely shouldn't be the same as the Romans.
I think you are spot on there my friend. I think the only common thing the British and Roman Empires share is the strength of their respective legacies.