Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
Anyways, it doesn't matter for the game, as Gamethrowing is specified as "actively going against YOUR wincondition" - if you expose someone who is NOT your faction (at least as long as you don't know they are, hidden 2nd SK/WW/Arso/Shroud are exeptions to this as you have no nightly communication possibilites), it's NOT gamethrowing.
It’s a solid tactic, he helps town win even if he has to kill a townie. As Pirate i always tell who my targets are, it helps confirm town and lets everyone know which rolls are in play.
Nope, the WW could turn on the town at any time messing with voting power.
Which should make town more willing to let the pirate live, increasing his chances of winning. So?
Sounds like a good tactic for the pirate to avoid town's ire whilst they focus on completing their objective. How would that constitute gamethrowing?