Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Anyways, it doesn't matter for the game, as Gamethrowing is specified as "actively going against YOUR wincondition" - if you expose someone who is NOT your faction (at least as long as you don't know they are, hidden 2nd SK/WW/Arso/Shroud are exeptions to this as you have no nightly communication possibilites), it's NOT gamethrowing.
It’s a solid tactic, he helps town win even if he has to kill a townie. As Pirate i always tell who my targets are, it helps confirm town and lets everyone know which rolls are in play.
Nope, the WW could turn on the town at any time messing with voting power.
Which should make town more willing to let the pirate live, increasing his chances of winning. So?
Sounds like a good tactic for the pirate to avoid town's ire whilst they focus on completing their objective. How would that constitute gamethrowing?