Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Also no.
Depends.
Ryzen 9 7950x
They really need to optimise this... i'm sure they are not using even 10% of the current optimisation practices available in Unreal Engine...
I have this same processor with a 3080 and I am running fine.
I don't suppose anyone in this thread has capped their fps?
5800x3D user here 32gb 3400 DDR4 RTX 3080
I found capping at 60FPS and removing motion blur kept my CPU at around 60-70% utilization.
I'm using a Be Quiet! Dark Rock 3 as cooler with Thermal Grisley Kryonaut paste.
Temps don't exceed 80c on CPU and GPU was 79c
Case is Corsair 3000D
Now if I unlock the framerate the story is the other way around, Temps near 88c on CPU and GPU also throttles at 83c
I'm noticing frame time spikes constantly as new areas are loaded in and out while traveling the area of the beach and the overlook town.
The moment I stop moving around and just stand still, everything drops, utilization and temps also. I'm thinking this game isn't well optimized yet.
I have mine capped to 60 and my CPU (i9-9900K) usage rarely goes beyond 30%.
Honestly, unless you're one of those people who are obsessed with latency, you really have no reason to go beyond your monitor's refresh rate.