Ignore the 7/10 review by Gamespot. Bias review.

[Master Zone]

Ignore the 7/10 review by Gamespot, it is just another biased review by another SJW. Just like Polygon giving The Witcher 3 a low score because muh white knight feelz, reasons.

"Poison Ivy is dressed for success, and like almost every one of Arkham Knight's female characters, is in need of rescue."

This reviewer gave himself away with this little comment.

(The reviewer makes this comment even though EVERY male character is in need of rescue and being beat the poop out of!)

I think it is obvious why this game got a low score (for the same reason Polygon gave The Witcher 3 a low score). Another SJW forcing his morals and political views on everyone around him with a bias review of a game.



But what can we expect of an Anita lover who even featured in one of her propaganda videos.
Go to 0:51 in the video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E47-FMmMLy0

[Typical Random]

I was really looking forward to the game but was worried when i saw the introduction of the batmobile and wondered if they'd force you yo use it to justify it's inclusion.

My fears were proved right. I'm neutral when it comes to gamespot, haven't really read many of their reviews. The problem is they explicitly said that the player is FORCED to use the batmobile/tank for a big chunk of the game.

That's a gamebreaker for me. Freedom is a must in this type of game. Batman is about gliding round the city and doing as you please, not poncing round in the batmobile blowing up stuff for hours. That stuff is mind numbing! The player should be able to choose whether they want to use the batmobile on missions or not. That is a must in this type of game.

All these theories about the score, i think 99% of the reason it got an average score is down to the forced car combat. end of story. Thank god someone was honest and told us about forced gameplay mechanics should be more the vibe on this thread i think.

Not trying to upset anyone, just my two cents. I know quite a few people feel the same way. It's very dissapointing. Player freedom is everything.

[Wolfie]

natman2939 eredeti hozzászólása:

miringains eredeti hozzászólása:

What are you talking about? I've watched the entire show and I have no idea what you are referring to? What cage?

I believe they were referring to Cersei being locked in a dungeon. They used "cage" to be more dramatic

But how is her brother locked in the cage too lol?

[Coldhands]

FoodStampTycoon eredeti hozzászólása:

This review sounds like the same holier-than-thou, painstakening attempt to turn over every stone to find something, ANYTHING to feign outrage over while cutting the review of the game itself short that I have come to expect from trash sites like Polygon.

Shame on you Van Ord.

I wonder if he proudly beat his chest when up on his soapbox, or if he was too concerned that might come off as a slight against women or that he has not felt enough white guilt lately.

Since the only time women are ever brought up in the entire review is a single line in a caption under an accompanying screen shot, and the body of the review is devoted to explaining what the reviewer liked and didn't like about the game, you sound like you've got no idea what you're talking about.

[VaporWave]

Gamepot gave this game a low rating because it's Gamespot, the home of overindulged douchenozzle writers with massive hipster complexes.

[Sovereign246]

Ok so i went ahead and read the gamespot review.

And now i have a new issue with it. Let me start by saying i skimmed the review the first time to avoid spoliers and having read it i take back a few things i have said.
So lets break this down. Lets aussme that each complaint deducts a point so starting at 10/10

He feels that the game forces the batmoblie on you and that the combat sections with it are tedius- ok fine no problem there he dident like it. so thats us down to 9/10

He feels that the story is predictable and a bit ham fisted. The big revel of the arkham knight failed to impress.- yep ok so far nothing wrong here. 8/10

The game refines the fundementals without bringing much new and is treading old ground.- this is my new issue looking at the gamespot reviews for call of duty advanced warfare and call of duty ghosts they gave both an 8. advanced warfare i could maybe get but ghosts? its considerd the worst in the series by a very large margin.

Its the same thing IGN did with arkham origins saying that it was too similer to arkham city giving it a 7/10 and then giveing that years call of duty a 9/10.

If your going to give a game series a free pass on not inovating at all then you give other game series the same courtesy or you dont give any game a free pass at all which is what i would prefer.

however with that last compliant we do indeed arrive at 7/10 as stupid and unfair a complaint i think it is condidering the score they gave call of duty.

[Stranger]

Polygon gives every game low scores even if there good so I just ignore them. Also it has a 91 on metacritic for the PS4 version.

[Coldhands]

DarthSith eredeti hozzászólása:

Polygon gives every game low scores even if there good so I just ignore them. Also it has a 91 on metacritic for the PS4 version.

Polygon gave Arkham Knight a 10/10 man.

[Mountain Man]

Master Zone eredeti hozzászólása:

Ignore the 7/10 review by Gamespot, it is just another biased review by another SJW.

What the heck are you talking about? Did you even read the review? Kevin Van Ord is one of the best reviewers in the business, and his review seemed very fair and objective. Don't cry just because a game you're anticipating wasn't given a "10/10! Perfect score!" because you sound like a butthurt fanboy. He still recommends the game but dinged the score because Rocksteady stopped taking chances and played it safe.

[Mountain Man]

predator246 eredeti hozzászólása:

The game refines the fundementals without bringing much new and is treading old ground.- this is my new issue looking at the gamespot reviews for call of duty advanced warfare and call of duty ghosts they gave both an 8. advanced warfare i could maybe get but ghosts? its considerd the worst in the series by a very large margin.

Different reviewers. Kevin VanOrd wrote the The Arkham Knight review. He didn't write either of the Call of Duty reviews you mention.

[Gorgiesgonewild]

*NEWS FLASH*

Every game review you will ever read will be biased (even the ones you agree with), because every human's perception is relitive. Life is relitive.

*END OF NEWS FLASH*

[Sovereign246]

Mountain Man eredeti hozzászólása:

predator246 eredeti hozzászólása:

The game refines the fundementals without bringing much new and is treading old ground.- this is my new issue looking at the gamespot reviews for call of duty advanced warfare and call of duty ghosts they gave both an 8. advanced warfare i could maybe get but ghosts? its considerd the worst in the series by a very large margin.

Different reviewers. Kevin VanOrd wrote the The Arkham Knight review. He didn't write either of the Call of Duty reviews you mention.

I actually tried to look at reviews that he had done but gamespots website donent allow you to see all the reviews by that reviewer in a conveniant list so yes the compareison is not ideal.

However maybe i wouldent have an issue with it if it dident happen every year. It doesent matter what website or reviewer is doing it CoD on the mainstream sites at least always scores high even when other people like Angry joe and Totalbiscuit point out such glareing obvious flaws that should by all accounts have resulted in a much lower score.

[VaporWave]

Mountain Man eredeti hozzászólása:

Master Zone eredeti hozzászólása:

Ignore the 7/10 review by Gamespot, it is just another biased review by another SJW.

What the heck are you talking about? Did you even read the review? Kevin Van Ord is one of the best reviewers in the business, and his review seemed very fair and objective. Don't cry just because a game you're anticipating wasn't given a "10/10! Perfect score!" because you sound like a butthurt fanboy. He still recommends the game but dinged the score because Rocksteady stopped taking chances and played it safe.

The problem with Gamespot is too often they'll go against the grain of the trend and pound on a game, seemingly just because liking the game is too hip and mainstream.

I'm all for honest reviews and I like reading both sides of a debate. But when it comes to Gamespot I've learned to not take their critical opinions very seriously. Same with IGN, but on the other end of the spectrum. Take the average of the IGN and Gamespot review and you probably have a far more accurate score.

[natman2939]

miringains eredeti hozzászólása:

natman2939 eredeti hozzászólása:

I believe they were referring to Cersei being locked in a dungeon. They used "cage" to be more dramatic

But how is her brother locked in the cage too lol?

Cersei AND queen margaery are both locked up, and queen margaery's brother is locked up too (in fact marg was locked up for lying during his trial)

sorry, I should've used marg as my first example to be more clear

[natman2939]

natman2939 eredeti hozzászólása:

miringains eredeti hozzászólása:

But how is her brother locked in the cage too lol?

Cersei AND queen margaery are both locked up, and queen margaery's brother is locked up too (in fact marg was locked up for lying during his trial)

sorry, I should've used marg as my first example to be more clear

Edit: Also Jamie lannister was actually locked in a cage at one point during this season, but just briefly (when he was captured in dorne--sp?-- trying to rescue his niece)

[nowhere man]

Master Zone eredeti hozzászólása:

Ignore the 7/10 review by Gamespot, it is just another biased review by another SJW. Just like Polygon giving The Witcher 3 a low score because muh white knight feelz, reasons.

"Poison Ivy is dressed for success, and like almost every one of Arkham Knight's female characters, is in need of rescue."

This reviewer gave himself away with this little comment.

(The reviewer makes this comment even though EVERY male character is in need of rescue and being beat the poop out of!)

I think it is obvious why this game got a low score (for the same reason Polygon gave The Witcher 3 a low score). Another SJW forcing his morals and political views on everyone around him with a bias review of a game.



But what can we expect of an Anita lover who even featured in one of her propaganda videos.
Go to 0:51 in the video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E47-FMmMLy0

Yup , ignore it, pay no attention to the guy behind the curtain.