No Multiplayer at all? YES!!!

[ShadowHawk27]

I'm glad that Arkham Knight won't have Multiplayer. Arkham Origins MP was terrible as it is cause there was hardly anyone on the servers, it can take forever for the match to be filled.

What really gets me mad though, is how WB seems to not want to support/improve multiplayer in Arkham Origins. They implemented a multiplayer with pretty good gameplay to me, but its plagued with issues like Steam connections dropping and server disconnects, both extremely irritating in the middle of a match, especially so when there's nothing wrong with one's internet access, meaning the problem must be on the server side. The number of maps (four maps, really?) is an issue.

Then there are the stupid issues like playing as a Hero in a skin that you did not equip/unlock, playing as Robin when you were selected as Batman, and playing a match with THREE Heroes (one Batman, two Robins).

With that said, I seriously doubt that WB will hire another studio to do the Multiplayer seeing that Arkham Origins MP was considered a failure.

Anyone else agree on this?

[H3.Wh0.L4UGH$_{X-D}]

yes i comletely agree with you!!!!

[ShadowHawk27]

Thank you, Batman Arkham Games were better off as Single Player. Sefton Hill said so himself, "The Batman: Arkham series is a single-player game only. There is no multiplayer. Right at the start this was our vision. The team plans to focus on making the best single-player experience we can. We don't feel that it needs a multiplayer element. Warner Bros. backed that up right at the start with Arkham Origins."

And look what happen with Arkham Origins MP, it was a failure with only 4 maps and 2 factions and there's nothing to incentive you to even give a shot to MP (unless you are into achievements) and only dumb players who WON'T play a single player game and just want a kill each other in online MP feature unfortunately because they have nothing better else to do. That's really sad...

[ShadowXENUS]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3ALwKeSEYs

[Sir Dookface McFerretballs]

Thank the videogame gods! Too many games are focused on multiplayer because of the call of doodie 12 year olds. Nice to see we can finally get a game that will be absolutely amazing for a change instead of an over milked yearly release cash cow.

[ShadowHawk27]

Yea i agree, Arkham Origins was never ment to have Multiplayer in the 1st place. This was done out of Warner Bros own greed to make a quick buck and look what happen, Splash Damage can't update that game with the connection problems bacause WB has closed the support. No point in playing that broken game if it won't be fixed.

I'm so glad Rocksteady is not going to put Multiplayer in Arkham Knight and I seriously doubt that WB will hire another studio to do the Multiplayer seeing that Arkham Origins MP was considered a failure.

[CrazyShadoww]

Thank you at last people actually agree with me on this i hate MP for arkham series

[Void]

I hate multiplayer for PC games sometimes because it ruins my achievement hunt on most titles with new or unpopular multiplayer. Example Tomb Raider I would have gotten every achievement in that game if not for multiplayer and since I knew it was impossible I didnt even attempt a second playthrough. Same with Arkham Orgins I couldnt even get multiplayer to work for the first month or so. It's so much easier on consoles to find games for everything due to the massive player base, I mean you can still play MW2 everyday in any mode on Xbox, just sucks alot that we can't enjoy our games forever in that prespective of constant multiplayer.