Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
I've heard good things about Warlock, though that has a bit of a learning curve supposedly.
If you liked the concept of dual wielding like on Rogue for example there's a set of perks that can help with that.
Thanks for the heads up, appreciate it. I normally only the pierce LMB attack on my rogue so I'm fine with one sword I think. Whats your opinion on the shield? Should I even bother learning how to use it?
Some might suggest using a Hand Crossbow paired with a 1 handed weapon over a shield, I haven't tried that yet (really should honestly) and others might swear by the shield, personally I like having a shield but I can see value in either approach.
I've been eyeing the ranger class, is it better to kill enemies at range with that class than using a crossbow on my rogue? One enemy takes like 5-6 shots, which is crazy I feel like
Will give it a try with a shield for a couple of runs then, appreciate you
Rangers also get a limited pool of melee options (Rapier and Arming Sword iirc with Short Swords being usable in the off hand) to conserve arrows, but they're heavily biased towards using Bows in most cases.
They do have a perk that lets them use Spears though.
Sounds like a nice class as well then. Will give Ranger and Fighter a try first, cheers!