Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And btw when u talked about a modded game say that u mean a modded game, other ppl can get confused and think u mean vanilla.
Edit: and in vanilla it ever happens second month.
I placed the LW in the topic but yeh I'll stick that into the topic too. Thanks
Thanks, I'm a noob to steam community. I will do so xD
well, if you really are to make a guide i would suggest you seriously rethink point 3....
yes over watch trap is nice, but, relying on it is nothing but serious, if you are going to play I/I, this is not a reliable advice
in march, april, that s only 6 overwatches, odds are you dont have 6 experienced infantries so most of your overwatches suffer from -20 aim penalty...providing the first building has nasty trap doors that have access to unsuspected vulnerable areas, given that overwatches can miss or hit and not kill...thats a good plan to end up with 2 dead soldiers(if unlucky)
lucky or inlucky is not the core discussion here, the important thing is that if you are to make a guide, you should be aware that relying on overwatch to deal damage or kill is a really BAD plan
overwatch in I/I is to prevent aliens from moving, not to kill them
i ve watched some of you vids, though you certainly are a nice fellow, you are also a very lucky one, good for you, but luck is sooner or later going to abandon you, you really rely on it too much and had you had normal luck, you would not have dodged the flanking shots you ve lived through, and the ones that did hit you surely would not have dealt a friendly 4 damage.
edit
"had you had" is that even near proper english???
Hi, thanks for the advice. Actually I'd like to raise a point about overwatching. Using 70 aim rookies (base 65 + 5 with laser sight). Since overwatches in LW provide a 70%*aim modifier while enemy light cover provides a flat 30 defense. I'd argue retreating when outnumbered allows you higher aim. I think you are underestimating early game low % shots, while yes they do indeed kind of suck, multiple 40-50% shots onto the same target usually provides a kill. My point #3 basically involves retreating out of LoS so that when a thin man comes to you, you get 6 shots while you are hiding in that building whereas the aliens have to either double dash across the street to get to you, or run to the cover below the building in the first building on Portent.
I hope that clarifies up my point. xD
BUT, it only works in the short term
-overwatches use bullets, laser rifles have only three shots...
-some ennemies, flying ones, can nastily find a unexpected position that will cause severe problem on your turn, in that case you are far better off with a steady weapon that will allow a decent shot at it on your turn instead of a normal shot
-some ennemies, flying ones again are hard to hit on overwatch, as they don t use cover anyway, in that situation, you end up with -20 overwatch malus, -30 flying target malus, for a total of -50
had you just shot on your turn, it s -30, had you steadied weapon behind full cover, it s -10 on next turn
-most important, if your rookies use HEs and flashbangs , you rarely need to overwatch, ennemy cover is not a problem anymore, you easily shoot or blind from your high covered troops, hunker the low cover ones, wait until the remaining capable ennemies make a move, then finish them on the next turn
overwatch is a BAD plan, not a horrible plan, but there are way better I/I plans that will assure you less med bay, less casualties in the longrun, really
It would be amazingly overpowered, if it weren't for the negative stat effects. Someone in cover may have a 15% chance of being hit, but when they leave, they may have a 40% chance of being hit. With overwatch, that brings it up to 20% chance of hitting them. Furthermore, you might catch an enemy who foolishly tries to reposition themself for a better shot. So, the overwatch is more likely to catch the enemy that is going to do the most damage. In contrast, overwatch won't waste ammo on an enemy that is just going to overwatch this turn. Plus, overwatch allows you to fire on enemies without exposing yourself to the enemy overwatch (i.e. you don't need to reposition yourself to hit them).
I can't say that it's the best strategy every time, but I certainly think saying it is a bad plan is at the very least an incomplete picture of the skill.
Throw on top of that all the skills that make overwatch better, and you have yourself a great skill. Especially for snipers.
Granted, I have never played impossible mode. Could be different.
In B9 actually I'd prefer the HE strategy but without sapper, it's almost impossible to blow up cover now. That's what I was doing in the first few missions and so and my entire last campaign :3. I feel like the nerfs to environmental damage have made HE grenades worthless unless it's on an engineer. Also it's not a -20 overwatch malus it's a 70% to aim. The xcom wiki is wrong; the ufopedia has the actual value.
Also I'd argue that minus the ammo, steadying weapon is rarely worth it. Mathematically (have to find the reddit link), if it's greater than 20% aim or so you should just fire twice rather than steady and shoot once. Of course, like I said I'd argue retreating is the best. The only time I'd steady a weapon is a sniper that has moved or breaching a door (killing the outsider in a landing)
In my last campaign, I really loved flashbangs but now I reserve them more for midgame work. A sectoid can be taken care of by shooting, thinman with an AP grenade. And floaters kind of just suck since they are usually flying so it's hard to use any grenade. This is why I've moved to just 6 hp minimal soldiers with scope + laser sights. Even as a corporal most of them have 85 aim so against a flying unit they stand a decent chance. When you get to mutons, I agree the flashbang is king but I think the new meta is duo gunners to suppress anyways what you can't kill / hit.
Against floaters, also I'd say pack a smoke grenade with heavy cover and you are more or less fine. Overall, I think both of us are seeing the game in a different way and you have some very good points as well that I will definitely take note of.
I think also I'm not suggesting never firing but rather that you gain initiative as you find a good location with heavy cover, overwatch. Get one free volley of fire against the enemy where you'll kill one or two of the pod and you are in an easily defensive location to counterattack the next turn and finish the rest.
Final Note: It's a bit ironic for me since last season everyone called me aggressive haha; that I'm now suggesting more defensive play :p
The above link is to a post that contains some data on steady weapon, and an interesting analysis. The TL;DR states:
maybe
i play beta14b on I/I with redfog now and don t have the same stuff you have
i frequently get crit hit one shot behind full cover,half cover without hunker down means DEAD in my playthrough, and my HEs do wonder providing i aim at things likely to blow up(desks, cardboard boxes, small concrete stuff) even with rookies
lets say the truth is in the middle , you are a very lucky man, i am a very unfortunate commander
Thanks! That's the one I was looking for xD. This is really a great read.