安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
Ya right. So basically everyone who are doing better than you is cheaters and not to be trusted. That is and interesting point of view. You have way to high thought of you own ability as a player.
Have a nice day Mr xcom king.
oh no. Sarinn, Marbozir, Christopher Odd, Beaglerush and many others are *far* better than me. Now please explain to me why those guys never had this perfect run on EW I/I.
Because it's plain impossible while recording *for the first time*. Maybe yes you can have it if you record and record again and again until you have this famous medium ufo / council mission / 5 engineers with no loss at the first place. I did record some episodes of 4 LPs myself before publishing the 5th one. And none of them was perfect - and never intended to be.
I don't really understand why we cannot express a personal opinion based on a personal experience and still waiting to face some real arguments... but personal attacks.
You can have your opinion, but you are flat out accusing a player you don't know very well for cheating in a lets play in a public forum. I personally don't care about you trusting him or not, but that is crossing the line for what i think is decent behavior. You can tell it to him if you feel the need to voice your opinion.
I agree with you, but public forum means public opinions, and if you're only allowed to talk about people you know, you'd better ask to close this thread. I express my feelings on what I consider to be facts, not a mere subjective point of view. And since those videos are public, I consider legitimate to vote for or against.
Now, I was also replying to the (pertinent) interrogations of the OP here, and well, if we all must have the same opinions on everything....
So, it's not impossible to cheat on a lets play game. I'm not accusing anyone, but don't pretend it can't be done.
You don't even try to break his game down to provide some facts that could explain why he was having a smoother run than most.
You start jumping to conclusions and that is cheap and really bad.
1) Zemalf have already completed the game one time at EU with I/I. So he already know the basic of the game.
2) In Zemalf first episode of EW, he tells that he have played the game a bit before the "lets play" so this is not a completely blind lets play.
3) His squads starting states. Zemalf is playing the game with "Not Created Equally" and "Hidden Potential". His soldiers aim is 75, 75, 60, 70, 65, 80, 80, 65, 80, 75, 80, 55. That is some insanely good starting states. That give him a huge advantages in every battle to come.
Those facts combined with good strategy as a player, should be more that enough to explain why he was doing good in his EW "lets play"
No one said it couldn't be done. What WAS said was, how do you keep all nations from leaving by cheating on impossible ironman? I see you skirted around the issue. You say don't pretend that cheating can't be done. No one has done that. On the flip side, please don't pretend you've answered the question, because you haven't.
Simply make incremental save copies of the ironman game (best done a day before each council report).Name them by their campaign date,you can pick and choose what campaign state to reload at by renaming the copied save file back to the active save file name (eg. save1) and then overwrite the exsisting active save with the one you want.
My personal opinion of wether Zemalf cheated in any way shape or form is irrelevant.I enjoy his LPs of games I play immensely as he has a relaxing LP style.I will admit that I have always been very jelly of the guys luck in practically every LP he has done,but I can't fault a player for good luck.
Myself have had three flawless playthroughs on standard I/I no second wave (one on Twitch live),sometimes it happens,most times it dosn't.
=)
If he's doing two missions in one video, then he most likely isn't doing what I described above, since that'd be way too much work to try and get through two solid missions without losing anyone.
To be fair,there is no solid evidence that Zemalf had tampered with save files at all and it was common practice even amongst Twitch xcom ironman streamers to manually save at the end of each month in fear of losing all progress to campaign stopping bugs.
When playing for oneself it's not such a big deal to restart,but when you're also playing to entertain others it's best not to waste their time with an early game over due to bugs that could have been avoided by backing up data.
=P
And this is why I begin to like the Long War mod a lot - you cannot go through it without failures - and this is exactly what is meant: recover from them. Playing it on I/I requires humility and discipline too, because well this mod is bugged and you'd better know about backup saving technics when the game crashes your single ironman save. And still, all is a question of *fun* there: playing ironman is not a matter of making exploits, but a question of supporting stress and fear for your soldiers, enjoying the nasty surprises, and getting most fun from the game even when bad things happen.
And I do really understand the players that do not like Ironman and prefer to play with save scumming. It's all about personal playstyle.
But the facts here are: 0 kill, 0 country loss, 0 mission failed, in more than 40 videos on EW I/I/. Don't get me wrong, I find this amazing and the guy knows his job and applies veteran technics and clever positionning - but I think that every veteran player does too. Backup plans ? Yeah, we all have some. And we all know that, sometimes, it's just not enough. That's how the game was designed, and that's fair for me - the game does not cheat, and you can loose this 99% shot when you *think* you cannot miss it and, so: you *don't* have a backup plan.
These are my convictions, and I don't pretend to hold the truth. Simply put: nobody can proove right or wrong there, but well, do we always need proofs to have an opinion on something ?
if you want an honest unedited lets play, you watch a stream.
youtube videos that aren't streams are edited. people say things in youtube videos that may or may not be true.
not sure the point of a necro. its a very old necro.
I know beagle did a stream on twitch and a lets play on Youtube.
his 'luck' was much stronger on Youtube.
unfortunatly he eventually got stuck in Player Unknown battlegrounds. which if that interests you, fine. It doesn't interest me.
What idols are you refering to, I wonder. I watched said playthrough and was puzzled at his luck in early game. In most civilized countries, there is a legal principle called "innocent until proven guilty". I guess it was established to limit the damage done by baseless accusations.
I just raped a dead body.