Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Edit: ...when other titles with HDR specifically state HDR10 as a tag on them.
You're almost certainly thinking of Bethesda the publisher (ZeniMax), not Bethesda the developer. Other devs they publish for such as iD Software are versed in HDR development.
HDR is not expensive to develop for, it just requires a lot of knowledge that developers do not have. You are better off with third-party mods from people who specialize in HDR development.
RTX HDR has better black levels than nativ HDR implementation, because the HDR1000/HDR10 standard says that the black level of a screen/tv cannot be higher than 0.05 nit, RTX HDR can...
Game developers simply following these standards.
The only reason that happens is cause a lot of games are made with only SDR in mind.
Then use RenoDX or Special K. They actually use the in game engine or data from the in game engine to render the hdr and isn't a post process shader like Auto HDR or RTX HDR.
Special K and AutoHDR have zero impact. AutoHDR may have some impact on very memory bandwidth constrained systems, but short of maybe handlhelds or laptops it's not measurable.
If RenoDX works it WILL look better as it is a change to the actual render pipeline to do HDR unlike RTX HDR and AutoHDR which are just post-process HDR. This means RenoDX will not affect UI elements either.