Just wait and see.

[RankedVegetable]

Look, I get it. I've been in the anti-woke camp for like 15 years, you don't have to tell me. We have been burned by this stuff in the past. However I would like to remind everyone that woke does not have a monopoly on women and minorities, It has a monopoly on preachy intersectional and badly written versions of women and minorities. This studio has done good work even with the gay character/characters that existed in the previous entry, treating them as they would have been treated in that area at that time. Trust but verify. I will say to the devs that I Hope to see how well crafted the game is after I've confirmed that the game is something I wan't to support, I believe there won't be any problems in that department. assuming that is the case, thanks for all your hard work.

[fwarlinger]

Top LGBQ game on steam

[Nikonos]

fwarlinger님이 먼저 게시:

Top LGBQ game on steam

Hey, it's great finally a LITBBQ+ game will be a hit. Finally. Stunning and brave!

[RankedVegetable]

Herald_UK님이 먼저 게시:

RankedVegetable님이 먼저 게시:

Intent matters. You are assuming the intent to push a political view but I would argue that the intent is to add more rpg style choice to this rpg game. If you could read vavra's mind and confirm that more choice was the intent would you be satisfied?

Frankly no. Plus, freedom of choice in a videogame, should never come down to whether you want to sodomise another dude in a videogame. What's wrong with you ?

Lol, I don't see why not. some people like men.

[i know kung fu]

Nikonos님이 먼저 게시:

fwarlinger님이 먼저 게시:

Top LGBQ game on steam

Hey, it's great finally a LITBBQ+ game will be a hit. Finally. Stunning and brave!

the new cod games are always a hit though.

[RankedVegetable]

Pharis Gough님이 먼저 게시:

RankedVegetable님이 먼저 게시:

Literally was here for the start of fem frequency and Briana Wu

hey, regular OG here as well. Also here's something that will get your jollies off. The wokies are now claiming brianna wu is alt right lol.

HA, that is nut's. what she do this time?

[Herald_UK]

RankedVegetable님이 먼저 게시:

Lol, I don't see why not. some people like men.

Of course there are. Those would called "girls"

[RankedVegetable]

Herald_UK님이 먼저 게시:

RankedVegetable님이 먼저 게시:

Lol, I don't see why not. some people like men.

Of course there are. Those would called "girls"

And you don't think any of those play kdc?

[Bee]

RankedVegetable님이 먼저 게시:

And you don't think any of those play kdc?

Why should anyone be obliged to respect anybody else's desire for thirsty prurience in yet another game? It doesn't add anything new--not only are there hundreds of games made specifically to scratch that itch, but there are also existing franchises that have already bent to giving pornsick weirdos more boning in their games, whether or not it makes any sense thematically to include that.

It's not new, it's not interesting, it's not something the extant customer base ever even expressed an interest in adding. Whether or not it's "woke" or "DEI" or whatever, it's just the most boring and predictable thing to do to a game in this era of gaming. For what? Nobody's clamoring for this.

[Amvorn]

Bee님이 먼저 게시:

RankedVegetable님이 먼저 게시:

And you don't think any of those play kdc?

Why should anyone be obliged to respect anybody else's desire for thirsty prurience in yet another game? It doesn't add anything new--not only are there hundreds of games made specifically to scratch that itch, but there are also existing franchises that have already bent to giving pornsick weirdos more boning in their games, whether or not it makes any sense thematically to include that.

It's not new, it's not interesting, it's not something the extant customer base ever even expressed an interest in adding. Whether or not it's "woke" or "DEI" or whatever, it's just the most boring and predictable thing to do to a game in this era of gaming. For what? Nobody's clamoring for this.

Ahh so we have crossed from "anti dei" to "goonergate" at least the Satanic Panic people are going mask off...

[Bee]

Amvorn님이 먼저 게시:

Bee님이 먼저 게시:

Why should anyone be obliged to respect anybody else's desire for thirsty prurience in yet another game? It doesn't add anything new--not only are there hundreds of games made specifically to scratch that itch, but there are also existing franchises that have already bent to giving pornsick weirdos more boning in their games, whether or not it makes any sense thematically to include that.

It's not new, it's not interesting, it's not something the extant customer base ever even expressed an interest in adding. Whether or not it's "woke" or "DEI" or whatever, it's just the most boring and predictable thing to do to a game in this era of gaming. For what? Nobody's clamoring for this.

Ahh so we have crossed from "anti dei" to "goonergate" at least the Satanic Panic people are going mask off...

Sure okay whatever--sorry did you hear "pornsick weirdo" and it hit too close to home and you had to slide away from the point as quickly as possible?

The point, which you shied from like it was holy-water-covered garlic, was that it's an uninteresting, completely banana-first-aisle, and already well-trodden modification that adds gross weird modernism to something that heretofore focused on cooler ♥♥♥♥.

Adults don't need every freaking thing to circle back to their genitals. Gaming doesn't need to slide into a giant red light district.

[Amvorn]

Bee님이 먼저 게시:

Amvorn님이 먼저 게시:

Ahh so we have crossed from "anti dei" to "goonergate" at least the Satanic Panic people are going mask off...

Sure okay whatever--sorry did you hear "pornsick weirdo" and it hit too close to home and you had to slide away from the point as quickly as possible?

The point, which you shied from like it was holy-water-covered garlic, was that it's an uninteresting, completely banana-first-aisle, and already well-trodden modification that adds gross weird modernism to something that heretofore focused on cooler ♥♥♥♥.

Adults don't need every freaking thing to circle back to their genitals. Gaming doesn't need to slide into a giant red light district.

Nope but I do have a clear memory of Lord of the Rings, D&D, Magic the Gathering, Pokemon, and Harry Potter... So those who would feign a moral grandstanding point of view should be called out and ostracized.

Otherwise, play the game, or don't play the game depending on your values. However do not preach and dictate morality to others or you will find the response is often in the opposition of your demands. As you can see Moral Grandstanding helped kill Lord of the Rings, D&D, Magic the Gathering, Pokemon, and Harry Potter very well.

[Bee]

Amvorn님이 먼저 게시:

Bee님이 먼저 게시:

Sure okay whatever--sorry did you hear "pornsick weirdo" and it hit too close to home and you had to slide away from the point as quickly as possible?

The point, which you shied from like it was holy-water-covered garlic, was that it's an uninteresting, completely banana-first-aisle, and already well-trodden modification that adds gross weird modernism to something that heretofore focused on cooler ♥♥♥♥.

Adults don't need every freaking thing to circle back to their genitals. Gaming doesn't need to slide into a giant red light district.

Nope but I do have a clear memory of Lord of the Rings, D&D, Magic the Gathering, Pokemon, and Harry Potter... So those who would feign a moral grandstanding point of view should be called out and ostracized.

Otherwise, play the game, or don't play the game depending on your values. However do not preach and dictate morality to others or you will find the response is often in the opposition of your demands. As you can see Moral Grandstanding helped kill Lord of the Rings, D&D, Magic the Gathering, Pokemon, and Harry Potter very well.

LOL and literally none of those had Gandalf banging Frodo, or cleric lady banging the PC, or card 1 banging card 2, or pikachu banging squirtle, or even Harry banging Hermione...

so whatever you thought your point was, your point is wrong and dumb.

All of these franchises existed without bringing thirsty prurience into them.

Otherwise, play the game,

No!

or don't play the game depending on your values.

Believe it or not, this was always the plan.

However do not preach and dictate morality to others or you will find the response is often in the opposition of your demands.

No dice, no deal. I'm going to say my piece no matter what your dumb ass has to say about it. I'm gonna preach and dictate morality all I want, thank you kindly, and there isn't a dang thing you can do about it.

As you can see Moral Grandstanding helped kill Lord of the Rings, D&D, Magic the Gathering, Pokemon, and Harry Potter very well.

These things exist despite you, not because of you.

[Iso Koala]

I think the game is fine and great.
The gay stuff is blown out of proportions, and director Vavra is being looney cuckoo to sabotize his own product, but I think the game will be great.

[Tyrolean Ritter]

Malum님이 먼저 게시:

This is my thinking as well. There were some bad signs of wokeness, but after the recent commentary and gameplay leaks by Grummz, we may have been painted an incorrect picture of the situation... We'll know by February 4th, at any rate.

You mean this Grummz?
https://x.com/Grummz/status/1881982010597712084

[Bee]

Iso Koala님이 먼저 게시:

I think the game is fine and great.
The gay stuff is blown out of proportions, and director Vavra is being looney cuckoo to sabotize his own product, but I think the game will be great.

You think the game is fine and great, without having seen the game? Odd take.

KC1 wasn't great, it was interesting, and it sold well because it was "the based game" back when it seemed like all games were being put out by blue-haired weirdos.

Well, turns out Vavra was always a blue-haired weirdo (which was obvious from the start, from the hair, the side-shaved mental illness haircut) and apparently his Hungarian patriotism lost out to sweet sweet investor bucks, and he's become just another Western game-dev (which means weirdybeardy terrible).

The game will be fine, I'm sure. It'll be just like all the other games on the shelf. Fine.

But I ain't buying it. There's no spine to it. I'm not going to pay money to get choose-your-own-sexuality-Henry and get preached to about women's rights by an African black. Those are both silly things and I wouldn't pay a dollar for them, let alone $40-60 or whatever they're charging for this tripe.