Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
NONONO SMALL company buy BIG COMPANY
NOT
big company buy SMOL COMPANY
how wuld that do
durr durr durr new york stock exchange tell me thing i belive thing i know not other thing durr durr america
so far you guys proof nothing, defending the game you have not play yet. we asked question from dev and they gave us BS answer.
Not buy.
Merge.
With the deal being they would use the BUD stock.
Because it was worth more.
You don't know what a subsidiary is, do you?
LOL okay then
BIG company
"merge"
with SMOL-er company
because nasdaq and other assorted buzzies because no matter what america first
Seriously, is "America corpo is obviously the biggest in the purchase because America" seriously the position you want to take here?
It was a buy, you huge ghey. The Belgian globohomo company bought the American company. Everyone alive at the time and remotely economically literate knows this.
Sort of, except that 90% of purchasers of the thing noped out and just didn't anymore and never got "caught" doing a dang thing because statistics exist. Because despite what Destiny told you, that's how the numbers are actually going down. A brand shrinking to a tenth its previous value is a hard thing to hide.
From people who aren't retarded. Which means you might get there. Eventually.
You'd be surprised how many people who get their rhetorical stool pushed in say exactly this.
*edit Of course, you'd be surprised by a remarkably-colored butterfly gliding by at any given moment, so this isn't exactly a landmark occasion.
They acquired.
And merged.
So yeah, that answers that question, you have no idea what a subsidiary is vs a corporate merger.
A subsidiary means that the acquired company has no more control over themselves. They usually lose their stock, though not in 100% of cases. Often their board members get positions on the board of the parent company if they were a huge acquisition, but not if they were a small one. InBev paid 52B for the rights to all of AB's properties and all shares.
Then merged.
In a merger, there is an agreement beforehand about buying out the shares AND retaining control over products, usually by combining boards.
Which is why they became Anheuser-Busch InBev. The company is not named InBev. It is Anheuser-Busch InBev.
And they retained the stock of BUD as a distinct stock, rather than combining it with their own, because it was of higher value. Why was it higher value?
A FRACTION the number of shareholders. Each share was worth more.
And he thinks he is "economically literate". You have never learned any economics whatsoever. I would be legitimately astounded if you had ever stepped foot in any college classroom.
InBev bought A-B, and that is a fact. You can look at the people in charge, and this will confirm who got bought by whom.
You cannot argue via wikipedia what reality is. It is what it is.
What you said it is is wrong and dumb. What it actually is is writ in reality. Just shut your stupid wrong-hole already.
Then.
Merged.
How do you not even understand the difference between an acquisition as a subsidiary and a merger?
Literally why they are named Anheuser-Busch InBev.
Why they use BUD stock.
You still haven't answered that simple piece of proof, why would they use BUD stock if they were a subsidiary?
Creative Assembly is a subsidiary of SEGA for instance. SEGA is their parent company. If SEGA wants to shut them down, they can do so without giving any reasons.
Anheuser-Busch MERGED with InBev after acquisition. 1/4 of their board is made up of people from AB, and must be for the next 33 years (unless this has changed since the acquisition).
It was a merger of two multi-national corporations. InBev paid 52B for the merger...and are now worth 87B.
Holy jesus. This is not opinion. This is fact, from their own public sources.
"Anheuser-Busch was established in 1852 in St. Louis, Missouri, US as Anheuser & Co. It is the largest brewing company in the United States and employs over 30,000 people. It was the world's largest brewing company based on revenue, but third in brewing volume, before the acquisition by InBev announced 13 July 2008. The division operated 12 breweries in the United States and 17 others overseas."
From the wikipedia you refuse to even look at.
Holy jesus ♥♥♥♥.
How are you just ignoring this after saying "Read the wiki"...that you didn't read?!
AB
Was
Worth
More
Smaller company.
Higher value.
Like, you thought they were just some small American company, when they had more breweries OUTSIDE of the US than within. When they had breweries on every continent.