Starfield

Starfield

View Stats:
Soulreaver Dec 21, 2024 @ 10:17am
Fun if focus on quests?
I got a few free days over christmas holidays and look for something enjoyable.

I remember reading somewhere that if you play Starfield by focussing on the Main and Sidequests it's actually pretty good. It's apparently only realy bad if you try to explore a lot on your own.

The game is available on gamepass so I wouldn't need to pay.

Any opinions on that?
Last edited by Soulreaver; Dec 21, 2024 @ 10:19am
< >
Showing 1-15 of 58 comments
tkwoods Dec 21, 2024 @ 10:24am 
If you have Game Pass why bother asking? You don't need our approval...

I have 1100+ hours in game and it is enjoyable i my opinion.
Soulreaver Dec 21, 2024 @ 10:27am 
Originally posted by tkwoods:
If you have Game Pass why bother asking? You don't need our approval...

I have 1100+ hours in game and it is enjoyable i my opinion.

I'm not looking for approval. I'm looking on opinions regarding the statement.

I'm someone who generaly tends to explore a lot. So I wondered if staying within the quest system would significantly improve the likelyhood that I enjoy this game.
Seongsan-Ro Dec 21, 2024 @ 11:17am 
Personally, I enjoy space scenery, planets, stars, weird creatures and habitats etc. So, I found myself having the most fun in Starfield by travelling to a planet and enjoying the ambiance, looking, and perhaps having to kill, the wildlife. Ironically, the main quest line is a bit boring, and side quests, for the most part, I found tiresome.
Last edited by Seongsan-Ro; Dec 21, 2024 @ 11:18am
Raven Dec 21, 2024 @ 11:32am 
Originally posted by Soulreaver:
Originally posted by tkwoods:
If you have Game Pass why bother asking? You don't need our approval...

I have 1100+ hours in game and it is enjoyable i my opinion.

I'm not looking for approval. I'm looking on opinions regarding the statement.

I'm someone who generaly tends to explore a lot. So I wondered if staying within the quest system would significantly improve the likelyhood that I enjoy this game.


Just try it on GP. Then you can explore all the aspects of the game and decide which bits you like to play. Personally, I avoid jumping straight into main quests, whatever the game, and spend a bit of time just 'looking around'. For example, just start the game, play the main quest up to the point where you get to a city, and then sped a bit of time exploring that planet and city and doing some minor side quests you will come across.
Last edited by Raven; Dec 21, 2024 @ 11:33am
wyodinosaur Dec 21, 2024 @ 11:49am 
One thing I like about this game is you can choose different playstyles for each playthrough. Like my first playthrough focused mainly on the main quest and various side quests. My second playthrough was exploration and surveying and similar aspects. My current playthrough I am mainly a ship collector (and, yes, I had to add a line to my startup batch file to enable me to own as many ships as I want).
bobbie046 Dec 21, 2024 @ 11:52am 
The first city New Atlantis has a lot of side quests, that are well worth doing for XP and cash
tkwoods Dec 21, 2024 @ 11:59am 
Originally posted by Soulreaver:
Originally posted by tkwoods:
If you have Game Pass why bother asking? You don't need our approval...

I have 1100+ hours in game and it is enjoyable i my opinion.

I'm not looking for approval. I'm looking on opinions regarding the statement.

I'm someone who generaly tends to explore a lot. So I wondered if staying within the quest system would significantly improve the likelyhood that I enjoy this game.

You have plenty of opportunity to explore as you go about following the quest objectives.
Mick Savage Dec 21, 2024 @ 12:06pm 
Originally posted by Soulreaver:
Originally posted by tkwoods:
If you have Game Pass why bother asking? You don't need our approval...

I have 1100+ hours in game and it is enjoyable i my opinion.

I'm not looking for approval. I'm looking on opinions regarding the statement.

I'm someone who generaly tends to explore a lot. So I wondered if staying within the quest system would significantly improve the likelyhood that I enjoy this game.

If you're looking for exploration this game is not it.
My experience is kind of the opposite. While I do love a lot of the smaller one-off side quests, the most fun I have in the game is setting off on my own and just living in space. Building a homestead, taking jobs as a bounty hunter or whatever, and saving up resources to expand little by little. Relaxing surveying. Etc. But to each their own. The fact that you can play the game that way or focus exclusively on major questlines is imo one of its strengths, like all open world Beth games, honestly.
Soulreaver Dec 21, 2024 @ 2:00pm 
Thanks guys for all your input. It seems to be that there is no real "best" way.

I'll just give it a go and play as I normaly would and if it clicks it clicks.
Apparently there are several kinds of fun to have in this game.
utahcowboy Dec 21, 2024 @ 2:24pm 
Hey OP, I think you're asking a good question. IMHO the questing, including the main quest are really good. The faction quests are really interesting and fun and tell good stories with good character acting. I will say, some are bothered by some questions left unanswered in the main quest. I believe BGS did this intentionally, and personally i like it, but some don't. Arguably the best quest in the game outside of the main quest is the UC Vangaurd quest line. You are introduced to it early in the game. And many believe it should have been SF's main quest. It is really good. The smaller quests that you come across vary in complexity. Some are simple fetch quests, while others are much more elaborate.

The issue a lot of gamers have with SF is that the Points of interest are random and repeated which causes them to loose their specialness. They are awesome the first time you visit them though. And the planets are mostly empty. The way BGS designed it is that as you quest more and invest more time into the game, more/newer points of interest will begin manifesting into the game world, but this takes 100s of hours to begin to notice. And most don't have that kind of patience. Which is understandable. However, if you visit the different planets with the intent on getting resources and admiring their beauty or finding fun and interesting landscapes to build outposts, then you will like them. If you go to the different planets expecting to consistantly find new and interesting hidden things, then you will be disapointed. There is some of that, but it is much more rare than repeating points of interest.

If you go into Starfield with this information and the right expectations, then you should have yourself a good time. And I hope you do. I certainly have.
Soulreaver Dec 21, 2024 @ 11:07pm 
Originally posted by Xenophobe:
that's the best way to play anyway ...

Yeah but there's a quote I like quite a lot.
"You need to meet a game half way"

Meaning:
If I play Barbie Horse Adventures I shouldn't expect Horses with War Armor but maybe there is a realy indepth collection of cool leather saddles I can choose from.

So, for Starfield it's maybe I expected a grand universe with countless of things to do and discover.
In reality Starfield can have a grand universe with a big variety of things to do and discover but only if you follow quests and the events they trigger in the game world.

I generaly think that's the best way to play games.
RasaNova Dec 21, 2024 @ 11:41pm 
Originally posted by Soulreaver:
I got a few free days over christmas holidays and look for something enjoyable.

I remember reading somewhere that if you play Starfield by focussing on the Main and Sidequests it's actually pretty good. It's apparently only realy bad if you try to explore a lot on your own.

The game is available on gamepass so I wouldn't need to pay.

Any opinions on that?
Many would say it's actually pretty good either way. (but then, many would also say both are bad! It's a bit of a divisive game...) There is a lot of gameplay in each scenario... But what you're probably reading about exploration is that the game will generate infinite procedural maps on each planet, which all end up feeling the same. I don't know if you've ever played No Mans Sky, but planet exploration is very similar to that game, but the difference (for me anyway) is that NMS is created around that mechanic while it feels tacked on in Starfield, and felt repetitive quickly. But if you enjoy finding pirate bases etc and clearing them out for loot or just general mayhem, it could be a lot of fun.

But then yes it's true you can mostly ignore that aspect and stick to the scripted stuff, which would still have you exploring planets but with more of a purpose.
Last edited by RasaNova; Dec 21, 2024 @ 11:41pm
oak Dec 21, 2024 @ 11:44pm 
Can I say for me, I explore endlessly - but I don't think it's the right way to start the game.

I sat down this evening, with a couple of hours idle to fill up, and I decided I'd skip away from the Shattered Space DLC content and check out the "At Hells Gate" Creation[creations.bethesda.net], a free Doom-inspired added location/quest/gear mod that came out recently.

I spent the better part of an hour jumping system to system engaging in some space battles, exploring a couple of places I'd never seen. Lost track of time before I thought to myself "Doom-inspired? It should be around Mars somewhere" and realised I'd forgotten to trigger the quest (listening at an SSNN [Settled Systems News Network] kiosk). Oops.

But, I've explored the game a lot, done most of the major faction missions and made myself very familiar with the game. When I started, I found it most engaging to follow the main quest for a bit, then I switched to the United Colonies quest line, in the middle of that I jumped to the Freestar Collective one, and along the way did the 4 major Constellation companion quests too. Plus a bunch of side missions along the way picked up in space or at the locations the primary quests send you to.

To perhaps sound contrary to the "play how you want" style advocates, which honestly is typically how I do go, I believe there is a genuine risk of the game making a bad, perhaps very bad, first impression if you go way off the beaten track and just start visiting random systems and planets without first playing through the crafted content. (I suspect a lot of the harshest critics did this, and it is near impossible to erase that first impression.) I enjoy just wandering, visiting random planets in random systems - but I've "been there done that", with the rest of the game.

Perhaps I'm explaining it badly, and while you might fall into that niche of players who love just quietly exploring random appearing planets to see nice vistas, I fear there's a greater chance of perhaps straying, finding barren planets and thinking "oh, this game is empty" when it isn't.

I rambled. In short: my advice is to make yourself at home first, and then explore without specific missions driving you. There's a lot of small random content to find, but it's going to feel sparse unless you first learn that the main systems hold a wealth of content. In my humble opinion anyway :)
Last edited by oak; Dec 21, 2024 @ 11:46pm
sarcastic_godot Dec 22, 2024 @ 12:03am 
I think the game is great fun, and there are times when Questing is more fun, but also times when Exploring / Survivalism is fun. Depends... ...just, the Explo/Surv part intrinsically comes without a storyline, ofc.

There are quests for most gamers' flavours:
Gallery looter shooter? check! Space-Flightsim? Check! Dialogue-heavy detective-work / clue finding? Check! Grand Space Opera main questline? Check! Sandboxy EconoSim? Check! etc. etc...

..some people just love to bicker about certain aspects of the game, but - that's often enough just their opinion, to which they're ofc entitled. What stries me as the best part is that, apart from when you're in the middle of a questline dungeon crawl, you can set aside what you just did for a while and follow a completely different course for a while, then come back later to continue where you left your old project at.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 58 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Dec 21, 2024 @ 10:17am
Posts: 58