Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
By your logic, Call of Duty must have copied Counter-Strike because they both have guns and multiplayer. That’s exactly the level of ‘argument’ you just made.
But if you actually compare ME: Andromeda and Starfield beyond surface-level elements, you’ll see they share far more DNA than most other sci-fi games. Bethesda isn’t exactly known for originality—they either recycle their own work (Skyrim reskins, anyone?) or lean heavily on what’s already trending. And Starfield is just another example of that.
Sorry but this isn’t an actual comparison, you are doing the exact thing momopovich pointed out.
https://youtu.be/Z5TqD5xf0ic
No,
base building, ship building, proc gen planet areas, open skill tree, item manipulation and persistence, nothing of that is in ME andromeda
Andromeda is a ME (corridor shooter) with light open world / space exploration element
Starfield is a Bethesda fallout/space sandbox crossover
That’s… precious.
Education system needs to be better so we have less threads like this one.
2 years prior to the release of me andromeda they started developing starfield. So no, they didn’t copy andromeda as there was nothing to copy.
Care to make an actual argument instead of just being dismissive?
lol