Starfield

Starfield

View Stats:
Starfield - Too Many Loading Screens
As you can see SF has too many loading screens. It's actually an uncountable amount of loading screens because all the counting experts got so bored of SF they could not manage to finish counting them. But it won the record before they stopped counting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1Jb-_f-mrw

Look at that boring gameplay of going to a new planet. Why did they make space boring? They must hate space.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 17 comments
Sunroc Jan 25 @ 12:38pm 
Originally posted by Gagdad⚫͗̃́̈̿̾̈͂̈́̏̏:
As you can see SF has too many loading screens. ...blablabla...blablabla....blablabla

I love raspberries and am really looking forward to spring. The temperatures will rise and we'll be standing around the barbecue with a few people.
Neo Jan 25 @ 12:44pm 
Really? We really needed yet another fake outrage post about loading screens? The other 20 or so threads was not enough?
Originally posted by Neo:
Really? We really needed yet another fake outrage post about loading screens? The other 20 or so threads was not enough?

Agreed, It's better when there's more of them and we actually need another, so if you could just get on that, it would be helpful.
Originally posted by Sunroc:
Originally posted by Gagdad⚫͗̃́̈̿̾̈͂̈́̏̏:
As you can see SF has too many loading screens. ...blablabla...blablabla....blablabla

I love raspberries and am really looking forward to spring. The temperatures will rise and we'll be standing around the barbecue with a few people.

I could go for some nice bbq chicken right now. Or chicken on an open fire rotisserie
Starbug Jan 25 @ 1:06pm 
How many is too many? I never watched the video but is that number revealed?
Originally posted by Neo:
Really? We really needed yet another fake outrage post about loading screens? The other 20 or so threads was not enough?
These folks need jobs, families and something meaningful to do with their lives. I pity them for the time they spend on this behavior and have for over a year now. It's sad really. Imagine being one of their parents or grandparents and seeing how your loved one spends the precious little time they get in life. :sad_seagull:
Originally posted by Sunroc:
Originally posted by Gagdad⚫͗̃́̈̿̾̈͂̈́̏̏:
As you can see SF has too many loading screens. ...blablabla...blablabla....blablabla

I love raspberries and am really looking forward to spring. The temperatures will rise and we'll be standing around the barbecue with a few people.

Raspberry's are rubbish. The colour is all wrong. They should be black and taste of lemons. As for spring weeeell, don't get me started. I'd rather play Starfield than eat raspberries. I blow raspberries at your raspberries.:steammocking:
Wade Jan 25 @ 1:24pm 
Starfield's biggest problem is that a myriad of outdated loading screens everywhere are not even among the Top 10 biggest problems of Starfield.
Originally posted by President Rabies:
Originally posted by Neo:
Really? We really needed yet another fake outrage post about loading screens? The other 20 or so threads was not enough?
These folks need jobs, families and something meaningful to do with their lives. I pity them for the time they spend on this behavior and have for over a year now. It's sad really. Imagine being one of their parents or grandparents and seeing how your loved one spends the precious little time they get in life. :sad_seagull:

I agree. Some of them have been at this since release and somewhere out there grandpa and grandma are worried sick for their lost starboy. "Why does he type on his phone all day, they say. Why does he have nightmares about refunds? I tried to give him a hug and he said it was bait. He reported my freshly baked cookies. I'm at my wits end."
Mooman Jan 25 @ 4:39pm 
If the loading screens didn't exist then Starfield would have wasted dev time in making the photo mode.

You don't want to endorse the wasting of that time and money, do you?

(For reference the photo mode was taken from FO76, so... no time 'wasted' as the code is that transportable)
kdodds Jan 27 @ 9:09am 
I just took a break to play some other stuff and I'll take SF's 1-3s screens over a 15s elevator ride or a 2+m cutscene any day. Neither will prevent me from playing a game, though.
minisith (Banned) Jan 27 @ 10:05am 
I'll get right on taking out loading screens. Where is Bethesda Studios that is working on Starfield at? As soon as I pick lock my way into work I will fix the game for you guys.

And work I mean slaving away to make high quality update before getting arrested. I was told by you guys it was all easy to do.
Crix Jan 27 @ 10:53am 
They just seem to be so invested with this aged old engine they keep patching and bandaging. It's will always be the Gamebryo engine. It's limitations are so evident in SF. I feel like I am playing a game from 2010.
JacEEEBABY Jan 27 @ 10:56am 
Originally posted by Crix:
They just seem to be so invested with this aged old engine they keep patching and bandaging. It's will always be the Gamebryo engine. It's limitations are so evident in SF. I feel like I am playing a game from 2010.
So true, not sure why SF has so many loading screens for a game that is filled with only empty planets.
Varanus Jan 27 @ 11:33am 
Originally posted by kdodds:
I just took a break to play some other stuff and I'll take SF's 1-3s screens over a 15s elevator ride or a 2+m cutscene any day. Neither will prevent me from playing a game, though.
Agreed. Like the people complaining about the tram in NA, and how it should have a whole animation where you get on the tram, and have to wait for it to travel to the part of the city you're going to. I'm sorry, but no. I'll take my loading screen, thanks.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 17 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Jan 25 @ 12:32pm
Posts: 17