Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And just so you have something to compare it against, here is my setup:
CPU-AMD 7800x3d
GPU-Radeon 7900xtx
Ram-32 gigs ddr5 5600mhz
Storage-2 TB NVME SSD
With this setup I play Starfield at 4k with max settings and I get a very smooth high frame rate (I don't know how high because I don't check). And no stutters. But, my rig was also pretty expensive to build.
But what do you mean performance monitor software?
I run at all maxed/ultra settings and can do so with the following:
i9-11900k
60gb RAM
RTX 4070Ti 12GB
1 TB SSD.
You will want a strong CPU, GPU, and high quality/quantity RAM. Starfield taxes all parts of the system.
update: game did not crash with FSR but with frame generation, any idea how to solve this? Cuz DLSS didn't improve fps enough for my laptop
Your RAM is the issue. The requirements say 16GB is sufficient but on my PC with Windows 11 and 32GB RAM I regularly see over 16GB of RAM being used. I have MSI afterburner set up to allow me to monitor CPU, GPU and RAM usage. I dont run a lot of programs in the background when gaming and my monitor is 2K not 4K so I'd say 16GB is the minimum not recommended requirement