Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Just what I was thinking, at least SF you don't have to pay through the nose to play.
I won’t rule out buying in on squadron 42 though…could be a interesting game.
Well, Howard better not learn to scam like Star Citizen because if not bad and now look at Call of Duty which is another scam, thank goodness there are companies like Bethesda that make great games and you enjoy thousands of hours per euro or dollar spent.
Also you buy the game and it's content once, until dlc comes along. But lel, star citizen is like riding the cash cows, while never getting a proper release, never getting properly reviewed, while charging ♥♥♥♥ tons of money for in game stuff.
Only cost like what, half a billion dollars, development time that feels like a decade, and is still not even feature complete?
You know what? Play Star Citizen, have some fun. But this is the Starfield forum.
Last I heard it was $600 million and 12 years in development, and its still in alpha.
Sitting through all that screen time of empty travel might be interesting precisely once.
That is the elephant in the room.
It's "cool", but after the second or third time people will be looking for the skip button.
OP's poor narrative is just to promote a game with a decade of empty promises.