Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But after landing at 20+ different locations to try and find SOMETHING I've all but given up.
Space, as you don't realize, is not some cold, empty void. It's absolutely filthy. Space suits are made of layers of materials, including layers of bullet-resistant Kevlar. Why?
Because every single time someone goes "outside", they are pelted by space-filth, grains of sand traveling at thousands of feet per second, bits of rock and debris hurtling at ballistic velocity. Without this, astronauts, and even moreso their suits, would simply not survive. Suits would be shredded, air would leak out and people would perish.
So where did Earth's mountains go? Solar winds and space debris that no longer burn up in the atmosphere ground them down, as if the entire planet were placed into a sand-blaster.
Mons Huygens is the Moon's tallest mountain. Its height is 18,046, about half of Mt. Everest, and it too is shrinking, being whittled away by space filth.
Earth simply took the brunt of this, because the Powers that Be decided it deserved it.
Sorry, but your math doesn't add up.
Also doesn't answer the question of how the NASA building is still standing if every mountain on earth got sand-blasted into oblivion.
You create a unrealistic event.
You asked for this.
Earth's moon has only ever experienced a tiny fraction of the amount of the seismic activity that the Earth has, so there's little reason for large mountain ranges to form in the first place.
And yet it has a mountain half the size of Mt. Everest, which is still pretty dang massive, despite the fact that the moon has NEVER had an atmosphere to protect it.
So yeah, no, I'm not buying the whole "sand blasted in only 200 years" hypothesis.
It isn't really realistic for the time when the game takes place, since if anything people are doing more now to lessen such things than they ever have. It just seems more like the rest of today's culture that they put in the game, which will kind of severely date it. In 50 years, people will laugh at those aspects of Starfield(if they even remember it.)
I watched a video where Neil Degrasse Tyson comments on how Stephen Hawking was saying something about the need to "Terraform Mars" as a place to live, but Tyson and other people were saying now that it makes far more sense and would be far easier to keep Earth livable.
The same would be true then. There is no way Earth would actually be in that kind of shape and it would make more sense to live underground on Mars as they do in Starfield. If anything, it would be far easier to build underground places on Earth.
I'm kind of hoping that DLC content touches on this, where we do find an underground civilization on Earth that is kind of "out of the loop."
https://science.nasa.gov/science-research/planetary-science/earths-magnetosphere/
Also. It's a freaking game. Did you really expect them to model the entire population of earth? I've already explained, even pre-release, why detailed modelling of an entire planet-sized planet is currently not possible. Simple answer to why the earth is barren? There would be no game if it wasn't. Period.
As for the planet being left untouched as a monument... wouldn't that just make it a haven for criminals, since the UC doesn't even bother patrolling it?
I doubt Spacers or the Crimson Fleet have any respect for monuments - seems like a place with zero traffic and zero security would make a great place to build a hidden pirate base or smugglers den.
Two birds with one stone.
We've got underground cities on Mars and Titan, and random procedural generated man-made structures on literally every rock in the settled systems EXCEPT for Earth.
In the latter case, the dev team needed to DISABLE something they had already implemented in the game in order to make Earth completely building-free.
Never did I say in my OP that I expected them to fully recreate the Earth.
I said I expected there to be at least ONE underground city like Cidonia or New Homestead and the same procedurally generated facilities that every other planet has.
UC patrols the whole of the Sol system, so they'd eventually see a number of CF or Spacer ships sitting in orbit there.
Earth also has no raw resources, like water or food, so they'd have to raid passing UC ships which would soon put them on the radar, and being so close to Mars and Titan would make it a priority target.
a hidden cache location maybe, but you couldn't house something that would be frequently visited there, given the UC patrols and the scanning of the system.
Even in that one main story mission with that one Vanguard guy who stopped at the old Nova Galactic shipyard, he was complaining how he keeps telling the UC to send the fleet out to deal with the Spacers on the station, but his requests were being ignored.
So yeah, there are already criminals hanging around in orbit around the planet - they're just avoiding the surface for some strange reason.
Okay, fair enough.
But of course, it was simply easier that way.
Watsonian explanation is that the earth was secretly intentionally destroyed to force humanity out into the stars. Most people in universe have no clue what really happened and there could have been a lot more going on that we haven't seen yet. Bethesda likes to give players contradictory and obviously false world building lore. Don't trust the official story.