Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Bethesda themselves do not know how to do this.
Starfield is an entertaining game but it definitely does not have the quality of writing that New Vegas had.
New Vegas wasn't Bethesda.
Maybe it will once Kojim-
Wait, what am I saying.
Just YES!
Starfield is the first game ever where people seem to wake up and grasp what's a Bethesda game.
The mass have been worshipping to some inadequate levels both Oblivion and Skyrim.
Now that Starfield is out, everybody complain their mother about *this*, or *that*, but completely forget that they point out toward aspects that define Bethesda games.
It's such a complete joke.
It's like playing a Pyrhana Byte game really, the mechanics and aspects of those games are like, written in a rock.
The same is true for Starfield, it's the *absolute* child of Bethesda.
The complaints about the game not being ''next gen'' are quite hillarious.
As the term itself is pure marketing.
Company trying to sell their games under pompous pretense have been around since the inception of the game industry.
For me at least Starfield is superior to all previous Bethesda games bare Morrowind.
And yeah, New Vegas is an Obsidian game.
defiantly a missed opportunity with the factions and perks associated with that mechanic.