Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you'd actually play this game and visit MAST museum you could find full history about universe, factions, planets and what happened to Earth before posting your BS.
But yes, they should have put that engine finally to rest, you can tell how some things in Starfield are cleary what they are because of engine limits.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdt85jgRHt0
From one of the greatest movies of all time
So everything crumbles and the Shard remains. Good one!
And everything on Earth is made of concrete. Good one!
Man, if only we have people like steamuser Kaneda in game development. Then we would surely have flawless games.
whatever the justification is, the devs are simply trying to find whatever it takes to prove
the minimal possibility of resulting in the situation of Earth the game designs.
The flat truth is: the Earth in game.
There can hundreds of factors that cause hundreds of different Earths in the game, but this is what we have: emptiness.