This game is proof gamers have no real standards.

[DD]

Cyberpunk was review bombed to hell and back on release due to an utterly disrespectful performance and stability state. I am currently on crash number 138 with 30 hours in starfield, how?? How is balders gate a game made by a studio notorious for the shoddy releases and bugs running multitudes better than your game bethesda?

Fast forward 3 years later to starfield, and this game runs and performs like absolute sht even on the more expensive hardware setups. You can't even excuse this crap, crashes every 20-30 minutes, important dialogue cutting out or skipping itself, bugs literally around every corner. FPS can't even hit a stable 60 fps on low settings on Mid-range rigs, And worst of all the game isn't half of the graphical fidelity of cyberpunk yet it still suffers just as bad, what in the FU*K is going on here bethesda, 7 years of development for what!!??

And you know we're going to get the braindead bethesda defenders ready to come in here and say they've had no issues whatsoever, everything is fine and that it must just be a "You problem". What a joke.

[Fresh]

I play what I like, and I don't play what I don't like. /end.

[PC Panda]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=P4vVxkbduMs this guy I think said it well, if you are looking for your skyrims & oblivions in space you won't find it

[Tiasmoon]

Cyberpunk was review bombed due to the abyssmal performance on previous gen consoles, and the playstation fanbase coming here and making the pc release (which had MUCH better performance) a part of that.

Otherwise it would have received a more average ''it has bad performance, but not the end of the world'' reception.

Also, your experience is not that of everyone else. I have yet to crash a single time and while fps is low its also a lot more stable then my experience in Cyberpunk. Having low but stable fps has much less of a negative impact then having higher but stuttering performance.

bugs literally around every corner

When you write this I have to honestly question if you really played the game, or are just repeating what others told you. While there are bugs present, the amount or severity of bugs is pretty low on the list of issues this game has. Atleast for the playerbase. I'm sure the devs feel differently about that, considering it a high priority issue.

[Lemdoran]

43h in, only crashed once, when leaving the game by the way.

A lot of loadings, but below 2s each is okey-ish, while i'll mod my way once the devkit is up to make an equivalent of skyrim open cities.

[Screaming Eagle]

I am that "braindead bethesda defender" probably, but I have 0 crashes in 34h of gameplay. Keep crying about "bad game", but iIt's most likely something wrong with your PC.

[Carlos Spicywiener]

I play what I like, and I don't play what I don't like. /end.

[Keldrath]

They just want remakes of older games at higher prices.

[DinoMight]

Originally posted by Fresh:

I play what I like, and I don't play what I don't like. /end.

the thing is, as title implies

some people have such low standards that its kinda funny watching them say "i eat what i like and i dont eat what i dont like" while they grab spoonfuls of rat poison

kinda hard to take you seriously mate

[Lizard]

This works a lot better than Cyberpunk did on release, not even comparable

[Tiasmoon]

Originally posted by Lizard:

This works a lot better than Cyberpunk did on release, not even comparable

Well to be fair Cyberpunk on PC wasnt all that terrible. Even then id still say this game is more stable.

[Keldrath]

Originally posted by Lizard:

This works a lot better than Cyberpunk did on release, not even comparable

I had more issues with this than I did with cyberpunk on release and cyberpunk was famously buggy, missing promised features, and with systems that didn't live up to what was advertised.

[TimsGamingDen]

Another one from the same Troll.. nothing to see here people if you have more brains then a Mosquito!

[Stumpy]

Originally posted by Dia3lo:

Cyberpunk was review bombed to hell and back on release due to an utterly disrespectful performance and stability state. I am currently on crash number 138 with 30 hours in starfield, how?? How is balders gate a game made by a studio notorious for the shoddy releases and bugs running multitudes better than your game bethesda?

Fast forward 3 years later to starfield, and this game runs and performs like absolute sht even on the more expensive hardware setups. You can't even excuse this crap, crashes every 20-30 minutes, important dialogue cutting out or skipping itself, bugs literally around every corner. FPS can't even hit a stable 60 fps on low settings on Mid-range rigs, And worst of all the game isn't half of the graphical fidelity of cyberpunk yet it still suffers just as bad, what in the FU*K is going on here bethesda, 7 years of development for what!!??

And you know we're going to get the braindead bethesda defenders ready to come in here and say they've had no issues whatsoever, everything is fine and that it must just be a "You problem". What a joke.

For everybody I’ll sum up this post

Waaa! Doesn’t work on my computer , waaa must be same for everyone . If you disagree f you waaaaa!

[Merque]

Don't worry this game WILL be review bombed at first too ;) Just give it 1.5 more days

[dot]

ChatGPT is really convicing in Steam Discussions, but dont let them fool you, just look at the account post history xD.