It is GOOD game, but... its not rly 10/10

[real_raziel]

For many years I have been waiting to play these "pearls in PS offer" myself.

And unfortunately I'm a bit disappointed. During this time, a lot of games have come out that do the same, just MORE and BETTER.

Such Red Dead Redemtion 2 destroys Uncharted 4 in every detail when it comes to details systems.

The refreshed TOMB RAIDER series itself also does many aspects better. More weapons, mods, semi-open map, LV UP system, more meaningful story.

Uncharted 4 plays like an interactive movie. It constantly takes away the player's control, overflows with tons of cutscenes.

Good game, but its rival TR1 / 3 IMHO fares better by 1 point.

[J0ust]

real_raziel eredeti hozzászólása:

For many years I have been waiting to play these "pearls in PS offer" myself.

And unfortunately I'm a bit disappointed. During this time, a lot of games have come out that do the same, just MORE and BETTER.

Such Red Dead Redemtion 2 destroys Uncharted 4 in every detail when it comes to details systems.

The refreshed TOMB RAIDER series itself also does many aspects better. More weapons, mods, semi-open map, LV UP system, more meaningful story.

Uncharted 4 plays like an interactive movie. It constantly takes away the player's control, overflows with tons of cutscenes.

Good game, but its rival TR1 / 3 IMHO fares better by 1 point.

Why are you comparing RDR2 to Uncharted? That's like comparing apples to oranges.

I will agree re. Tomb Raider though. I remember everyone saying "...they're just ripped off Uncharted." Now having played both series. Tomb Raider has better puzzles, better exploration, better combat, and actual progression - all of which Uncharted lacks.

But yeah, don't compare an open world immersive sandbox to a linear cinematic game, you look dumb.

[Mu'Ammar of Carthus]

It's not a bad game by any means, but it's really nothing special either.

The story is just decent, I guess the spectacle is good, the shooting feels pretty mediocre if I'm honest, it's one of these games where the bullets seem to travel 15 feet and then disappear. It's got little to no feeling to it.

The climbing is serviceable but this kind of gameplay already started to feel tired by the time Assassin's Creed Brotherhood came out.

Honestly, the biggest thing it got going for itself is it's production value and polish.
It's a nice little interactive movie, on par with the Tomb Raider games.

But 10/10? Not in a million years.
It's a 7 at best.

[Circurose]

At best, 7/10

Boring semi-open world sections
Filler chapters
Worse hand-to-hand combat


BUT ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ THE ENDING BOSS FIGHT

10/10 game.

[johnwick]

I said 7 but i could accept a 6 or 7/10 if you move away from production value. I Wanted to play it for not having a PS4/5 but i've played all the rest. Just top complete my series experience. 7/10 is a generous and rose tinted score for this entry but i could not go lower than 6. I really enjoyed most cutscenes and the story but i'd not want to see them twice.

I will probably never play it again and i am certainly not going to chase the achievements but i got some funny ones for driving off cliffs and stuff.

I had no major bugs, pretty constant 120 fps on ultras 1440p and 2 crashes. Overall i'm happy since it was good story, good production value, average game play, even for the time, but still fun enough to hold the whole thing together.

[Captain_Cole]

real_raziel eredeti hozzászólása:

For many years I have been waiting to play these "pearls in PS offer" myself.

And unfortunately I'm a bit disappointed. During this time, a lot of games have come out that do the same, just MORE and BETTER.

Such Red Dead Redemtion 2 destroys Uncharted 4 in every detail when it comes to details systems.

The refreshed TOMB RAIDER series itself also does many aspects better. More weapons, mods, semi-open map, LV UP system, more meaningful story.

Uncharted 4 plays like an interactive movie. It constantly takes away the player's control, overflows with tons of cutscenes.

Good game, but its rival TR1 / 3 IMHO fares better by 1 point.

Isn't personal taste awesome.
I mean, alot of people love Red Dead Redemption 2 but I find it to be overrated and boring.
Resident Evil 4 to many is the pinnacle of Resident Evil games yet realistically to me it only gets the credit from players because it was the first to do things within it's genre differently and overall it too is overrated and just not a very good game.
Uncharted 4 is very heavy on the story elements which seem to take up alot of the experience. That can be annoying but at least, to me, the game play is decent, if not dated due to it being a 6.5 year old game.
Personal taste for you.

[aarmosher]

apples and orange are different. some people likes apple better, some like orange better.
both are good and healthy for you though

[SnowWalker]

GRIMM eredeti hozzászólása:

Hate to break it to ya bud, but very few games are 10/10.

I would give 'Alien: Isolation' an 8/10. Fallout 4 too. This game too.

[Calimba]

shimsham29 eredeti hozzászólása:

I'm a big fan of Uncharted 4 and prefer it to at least the first two (excellent) Tomb Raider games you mention as I have yet to play Shadow. This isn't the case for the original Uncharted trilogy as those to me were not as good as those first two Tomb Raider games. The Uncharted trilogy is vastly overrated and has way too much forced gunplay.

I don't do the 10 score rating stuff but if I did, I'd probably give Uncharted 4 something like 9.1 or 9.2. RDR2 would be 10 for me, probably the only 10/10 game. Witcher 3 would be maybe 9.5 or 9.6.

The trilogy is not overrated. Uncharted games were really very ahead of their time (especially the multiplayer gamemodes, still the best multiplayers from shooter genre that came into existence imo), except UC1, which is like a COD, lol.

[Calimba]

razeedazee eredeti hozzászólása:

I think Uncharted 2 was the best mix story and gameplay but after that they focused more on story and less on gameplay. Not bad as story driven games go but Tombraider pushed forward the gameplay side and i prefer those games for character progression and gameplay.

Dunno why people compare Red Dead to this game. They went for immersive realism in the setting. It's better to stick with the Tombraider / Uncharted comparision.

This game is very predictably Uncharted in gameplay with nothing new or innovative in that area. I knew instinctively how to complete areas and progress and find treasure. Very little in the way of real challenge.

The cutscenes, acting and storyline are great and it's more interactive story than openworld adventure. It is what it is.

I'd give it a 7/10 for great story and consistent gameplay but the gameplay is a bit dated (even at release time and more so now) and it's weakest area, especially outside action set pieces.

At the time Uncharted 2 was out i'd say that game was a 9 out of 10, to compare. Maybe even worthy of the real 10/10 crown. It did have flaws but more technical issues like multiplayer stuff.

As of today, the Tombraider series have better and more innovative game play in the genre though clearly a lot was learned and taken from Uncharted 2.

Not really focused on story, not until UC4. Besides, UC2 has unnecessary story and filler too; like the forced stealth chapters, those were the worst, especially because stealth in UC was always bs lmao.

Uncharted 1 = full assaults, barely climbing and parkour/exploring. Not action movie paced at all.

Uncharted 2 = perfect balance; half assaults, half climbing and parkour/exploring. Some memorable action scenes and barely forced like a movie. Melee improved.

Uncharted 3 = A LOT of climbing, parkour and exploring. Barely assaults. A lot of action scenes, but a lot of them are forced like a movie. Melee improved even more.

Then, they kicked the whole development staff of Uncharted, including the director, which caused a lot of retcons in UC4 story and some downgrades, like the combat (you can't throw grenades back and melee was even worse than melee from UC2).

I didn't finish UC4 yet, but to me, it looks almost exactly like UC3, but way worse; excessive climbing moments, too much exploration and parkour, barely assaults, some action scenes (a bit less than in UC3), but even more of them are forced like a movie, also, way worse action scenes than UC3 overall. Along with the downgrades I already stated, and the only improvement in gameplay was stealth (addition of bushes, lol), which is bs anyways so it doesn't matter. A mechanic to climb more (repetitive and boring), the grapple/rope (which is great but that's the single thing) and looking visually better are the only upgrades of the game. Semi-open world chapters isn't an improvement at all, since UC was doing fine as a linear game. Not to mention, UC4 is the only Uncharted which lacks of fantasy, although UC3 already had an huge downgrade with that cuz it was only visions from magic water. And UC4 barely has boss fights (compared with UC2-3 which have some cool boss moments), and the fights the game has feel very limited because of the melee downgrade, and some of them being made to limit you on purpose (ehem Nadine).

Not saying UC4 is bad, but feels really like a downgraded UC game, which is sad. So in order from best to worst, U2 > U3 > U4 > U1

(if we include multiplayer, UC3 is better than UC2)

[LegionIscariot]

I find most exclusives to be around 6/10 or 7/10. Whether it be Sony or Microsoft. They are just games with big budgets and big marketing and their value really comes from the fact that they are "exclusive". But they are no better than any other game.
I found Spiderman overall to be a 6/10. God of War was an 8. Halo Infinite 4/10. Gears 5 4/10. Days Gone was surprisingly good, not perfect. I am still happy to see these games on pc.

[Jojo]

Any Naughty Dog game after Jak X Combat Racing is goyslop.

[Sikklid]

Of course not. Hardly any game is. Even the ones that score 10/10 by corporate suck up game reviewers, youtubers and streamers arent 10/10.

HOWEVER, it was most definitely amazing for its day and if played on release, on day one, you would have joined those of us blown away by what was capable with that little PS4 box running its crappy APU. Of course newer games with far better tech, level design and storytelling methods have released since, including games like God of War so its strange to judge it by today's standards and say it isnt very good. It's a timeless classic nonetheless - and no singleplayer microtransaction scamming!

I'm always baffled when people finally play old but highly praised games, many years after new games and tech have released then say the old one isnt that good, its over rated, or that they were expecting something beyond what was capable for the time.

Logic eludes some folks I suppose.