安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
The only map I'd consider Bad with a capital B is the Arche Abbey. Everything else is just fine. Looks great, not too confusing, loops back on itself multiple times (though I normally don't use the shortcuts).
Still an amazing game and my GOTY for last year. But I wish they had somebody competent designing the levels.
Oh, and the more circuitous environments are kinda samey. Let's take the Lorenzini Arcade: a few more carpet/wall patterns, a couple unique rooms with weird furniture pieces, maybe some utility items to differentiate the underground segments more easily... That'd take an 'ok' area and make it great.
While the map design isn't outstanding, it's not bad, either. You get to fight each enemy type in a variety of combinations and environments, and the shape and side of an area impacts how you approach fights. You get plenty of vantage points to look out on the rest of the stage and orient yourself... And the game doesn't waste your time with dead-ends; longer side paths tend to loop back to the main quickly.
Even the Abbey, which is the worst level for me, isn't outright bad.
Its no open world game like ER (fortunately)...just a classic soulslike linear "go through" map design