安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I think this could do with being a game option.
1. Realistic trade prices
2. Sadistic trade prices.
Why I said "geometrically"? lol
It seems that if you load a save game that had a lot of opened trade routes you will end up with silly high prices to open new ones.
This game have too many unlogical restrictions.
Having the trade route cost be an option on new-start would certainly be a decent choice, I think. Those that want a mega economic challenge could have it, then, and those that are wanting a more casual/sandbox experience could still have it.
I *DO* think trade could be a little OP'd, but using/cheesing trade excessively is a choice a player picks. Not everyone picks that choice. So raise those prices/alter those nodes a bit, sure, it probably did need that, tbf, but "exponentially?" That''s kind of silly. Just imo.
I don't think it works as intended.
Trade development points were OP, not trade itself.