安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
And every year or so, I'll play a run of Ascendancy.
Look'em up, they're not dead, for good reasons, and MGT 2 will probably also stay alive for a while.
I guess modern gamers are too used to the format of "keep adding DLCs and 'new' content for a decade so we can keep milking people out of money" that way too many dev teams use.
How about fixing the multiplayer region limitation then? Players from different download regions can't play together.
https://steamcommunity.com/app/1342330/discussions/0/6361972321502529515/
If the developer, one day, decides do make a MGT3 I hope for a better inovation in terms of game mechanics: MGT2 is marginally better then MGT1, and I think this in not a good business model - make sequeles that are just a little better then the previous. Just read the negative reviews, they are all about this issue. There's lot of room for game mechanics improvement without even adding more content.