Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
And every year or so, I'll play a run of Ascendancy.
Look'em up, they're not dead, for good reasons, and MGT 2 will probably also stay alive for a while.
I guess modern gamers are too used to the format of "keep adding DLCs and 'new' content for a decade so we can keep milking people out of money" that way too many dev teams use.
How about fixing the multiplayer region limitation then? Players from different download regions can't play together.
https://steamcommunity.com/app/1342330/discussions/0/6361972321502529515/
If the developer, one day, decides do make a MGT3 I hope for a better inovation in terms of game mechanics: MGT2 is marginally better then MGT1, and I think this in not a good business model - make sequeles that are just a little better then the previous. Just read the negative reviews, they are all about this issue. There's lot of room for game mechanics improvement without even adding more content.