Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
What will become of my life now. However, the fact remains that From Software games don't deserve the success they have for the reasons I mentioned above. For Steam rewards you can also keep them all, my goal is another
And release a DLC at full price lol
There are much better games then these that never got recognition like Nioh 1 and 2, to me Nioh series is much much better then any Dark Souls game. And ofc Sekiro and Bloodborne. To me Elden Ring is not even in top 3 Souls games yes people consider it the best for some strange reason when this game is just like any DS game just with better graphic and open world, there is nothing in gameplay department that make it stand our from Dark Souls games.
This judgment is predicated on the idea that GOTY winners should be doing something new or innovative in order to qualify for the award. Outside of indies (and even then, only rarely) you're not going to see much of this.
GOTY, like most awards, is largely political (and not in the Repub/Dem sense); it's more a matter of who has your back than what you actually accomplished, and in that sense it is functionally meaningless. In the sense of "whether or not a game I enjoy winning an award has any impact on my enjoyment of that game," it is *absolutely* meaningless, and making any kind of deal out of which game won which award suggests only a need for approval of things you enjoy--which is, I gotta say, a little sad.
Beyond that, you're not wrong in that most Souls games are just reskins of what came before, but many people enjoy what is familiar; this is the root of the aphorism "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." This tendency toward what is comfortable/familiar is what informs, for instance, why I don't enjoy any of the Final Fantasy games after IX. I grew up with the first one, and the series peaked for me at VI--but that is just preference, which is inherently subjective, speaking. People who love the newer games are not objectively wrong--their tastes just do not align with mine.
Same concept applies here.
TL;DR: Arguing preference as if it is somehow predicated on an objective set of standards is always going to come across as performative pedantry.
"I am very intelligent. I conflate my preferences with objective analysis. These statements are not in conflict with one another."
FTFY
"A bait must not contradict itself, once it does it becomes a fool's ramblings"
-Deng Xiaoping