Bloodborne has the best iteration of the Moonlight Greatsword

[SoundsOfNight]

Was watching old PvP vids of mine (shameless plug), and what stands out is the super useful strong attack which is a powerful straight thrust / small AoE attack.

Elden Ring's strong attack is wasted on a buff :(. Also, the unbuffed MLG looks like it would hurt your shoulder, so I dock pts there too.

[TwinChops]

what is it with the Bloodborne fanboys gloating about the game that isnt even aviable on pc and thus is inferior.

[SoundsOfNight]

Originally posted by TwinChops:

what is it with the Bloodborne fanboys gloating about the game that isnt even aviable on pc and thus is inferior.

Rude

[the Witch-King of Angmar]

idk, not a fan of the silver bullets things. Rakuyo has a good moveset and doesn't require silver bullets.

I like the elden ring iteration because finally you can just shoot lasers endlessly without muh durability, shame the aoe radius is mid af tho.

[paladin181]

Originally posted by the Witch-King of Angmar:

idk, not a fan of the silver bullets things. Rakuyo has a good moveset and doesn't require silver bullets.

I like the elden ring iteration because finally you can just shoot lasers endlessly without muh durability, shame the aoe radius is mid af tho.

It's absolutely outclassed by Wing of Astel for ranged attack though. There is almost no reason to use DMGS over wing. Wing is faster and has a quicker and powerful ranged attack.

[the Witch-King of Angmar]

Originally posted by melfice181paladin181:

Originally posted by the Witch-King of Angmar:

idk, not a fan of the silver bullets things. Rakuyo has a good moveset and doesn't require silver bullets.

I like the elden ring iteration because finally you can just shoot lasers endlessly without muh durability, shame the aoe radius is mid af tho.

It's absolutely outclassed by Wing of Astel for ranged attack though. There is almost no reason to use DMGS over wing. Wing is faster and has a quicker and powerful ranged attack.

I use neither tbh lol. But agreed Astel do be quicker

[SoundsOfNight]

Darkmoon has much better poise break tho

[hemorrhage911]

Originally posted by TwinChops:

what is it with the Bloodborne fanboys gloating about the game that isnt even aviable on pc and thus is inferior.

There is more to games that just resolution and FPS. It's ideal to have Bloodborne at higher framers and resolution, but playing it on PS5 gets you a steady 30fps now - again, it's not ideal and hope we get a remaster one day, but to suggest it's "inferior" while disregarding the rest of the content is just elitist cringe.

[Arokhantos]

Originally posted by TwinChops:

what is it with the Bloodborne fanboys gloating about the game that isnt even aviable on pc and thus is inferior.

Many want Bloodborne on PC me included.

[Dollmaker]

Originally posted by DragonSoundxSG:

Darkmoon has much better poise break tho

And Frost

[An Irate Walrus]

Originally posted by TwinChops:

what is it with the Bloodborne fanboys gloating about the game that isnt even aviable on pc and thus is inferior.

Honestly, Bloodborne is--at least in my opinion--the strongest of the Soulsborne titles in terms of raw atmosphere and narrative drive.

The big problem is that it's held back by being leashed to the launch PS4; if we ever get a PC version, or even a PS5 performance patch that sets it at 60fps, it'll *really* sing.

As it is, the framerate is atrocious, and given that BB's combat practically *demands* aggression in a way no other Soulsborne title does, that's major knock against it as a total experience.

Still a damn fine game, even if it does club players over the head with "hey guis, we're doing Lovecraft! Y'know, Cthulhu and ♥♥♥♥!"

...ER actually has more Lovecraftian elements, and does a better job at weaving them subtly into the prevailing narrative line, but for raw atmosphere, I'd give it to BB, every time.

[King of Games]

Originally posted by TwinChops:

what is it with the Bloodborne fanboys gloating about the game that isnt even aviable on pc and thus is inferior.

I don't get it either, maybe once ps4 emulation is actually viable I'll care.

[DamZe]

BloodBorne is also irrelevant, unless $0NY find it in their greedy hearts to port it to PC.

[An Irate Walrus]

Originally posted by DamZe:

BloodBorne is also irrelevant, unless $0NY find it in their greedy hearts to port it to PC.

I don't understand this argument. Porting the game to PC would only generate *more* sales. Since console hardware is almost exclusively sold *at a loss*, where's the greed inherent in not porting it to PC?

I support a PC version, mind. I'm just not seeing the connection between "won't release on PC" and "greedy."

...and if the port's imperfect, someone is going to call it a "cash grab," furthering my confoundment.

[King of Games]

Originally posted by DamZe:

BloodBorne is also irrelevant, unless $0NY find it in their greedy hearts to port it to PC.

We're getting Spiderman, idk what the deal is

[An Irate Walrus]

Originally posted by King of Games:

Originally posted by DamZe:

BloodBorne is also irrelevant, unless $0NY find it in their greedy hearts to port it to PC.

We're getting Spiderman, idk what the deal is

Sony is going the Squeenix route in terms of confusing business decisions lately.

Why Squeenix has not ported Chrono Trigger or the FF Pixel Remasters to Switch, which would be like literal licenses to print money, I don't know.

Sony, similarly, doesn't seem to want to do much with some properties (BB), while spreading others around (Yakuza, Dad of War, Spiderman, Days Gone).

Not sure what their deal is, but I guess that's why I don't make C-suite bucks.