Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
thats with all settings cranked up (water, shadow distance etc.) and TAA.
That is crap is all honesty
min: 3.85 fps
max: 127 fps
avg: 27.76 fps
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yD3xd1qGcfo
Skip to 13:35 for 1440p @ high. Same chart that has cards like 5700XT and 1080ti doing 48fps 1% lows. This game isn't worth 30$ in its current state.
No, Vulkan is better for all both Nvidia and AMD.
Well what did you expect? You enabled MSAA. MSAA is a frames killer, dumbo, and you don't need it. TAA is good enough, especially for 1440p.
Also this games Ultra settings are made for future hardware. Game looks amazing even at medium settings, way better than on consoles.
https://youtu.be/0WVLx6TULf8
At 1080p ultra he is getting 60+ frames mostly with a few dips, and GPU usage at 90%+
Game is very very GPU hungry.
min: 4.21 fps
max: 61.42 fps
avg: 58.56 fps