Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
The game needs significant optimization as well, using low end graphics cards stutter very much in this game, but Titanfall 2 does not.
I would kinda argue with that statement. You see, the game itself has the same engine (as said TF 2) however Apex has gotten more extensive and bigger (just compare the map in both titles). So no doubt it needs a faster gpu for some extent.
But I agree that Apex needs an optimization patch. My average framerate is about 90 fps, but all it needs is 2 squads and a few backgound effects to drop fps as low as 50-60 fps. And the thing is my cpu isn't getting used more than 50-60%. This bottlenecks gpu load only up to 80-85% (while it needs to be around 99% for the most performance).
it works
for me there is no change
ryzen 3600 use 30-35%
1070 use 95%