Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198014150309/recommended/
Anyways ... I was replying simply to say my Negative Fallout 76 Steam review is better.
Next time simply link your review in the post so you can avoid spamming walls of text.
See ... like this ...
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198007178612/recommended/1151340?snr=1_5_9__402
Welp, have fun !
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198014150309/recommended/1151340/
(My review links here)
- regarding the cap payment during fast travel, there are many places you can fast travel for free: your own Camp/survival tent (FO1st), your team member Camps, certain places like Whitespring Resort, Rusty Pick, Nuka World on Tour, Vault 76, etc.
- it barely matters for mid to endgame players where you already have thousands of caps
Btw, I'm 50/50 on this review. On one hand, this was greatly written. On the other hand, the thumbs down and heavy emphasis on microtransaction make it sounds like this game is like most other games with microtransactions and almost predatory
The only reason I'm considering FO1st is for the 1650 Atoms it give among other things but thankfully I don't see spend a dime other than the base game
I agree about caps - however, if we both agree that in mid-late game travel price is inconsequential... Then why have it at all?
All previous Fallout game worked just fine without fast travel prices.
Comparing this game with Fallout 4 and any predatory free-to-play mobile game, I would expect FO76 to be 90%-95% like Fallout 4. And only 5%-10% like a free-to-play mobile game (at most).
Surprisingly, the division is more around 50%/50%.
This game is only 50% Fallout 4, and in the other 50% it's Brawl Stars.
This includes:
- Ability to buy in-game currency (Atoms) with real money (aka microtransactions)
- Fast travel costing money
- Having multiple incentives to log-in daily (daily freebies in the atoms market, daily seasonal tasks, etc.)
- Having daily limits preventing you from playing to much in a single day, and incentivising you to return the next day (daily vendor caps limit, daily scrip limit, daily bullion limit, etc.)
- Having multiple different in-game currencies (caps, atoms, stamps, scrip, bullion, etc. etc.) All important for different things. None convertible to other currencies.
- Seasonal prizes
- Season pass you can buy
- Ability to make the game more enjoyable by paying monthly fee (aka Fallout 1st)
- etc.
It's not one or two things.
It's a huge portion of what this game is.
My decision to play this game and how long to play it any given day, is hugely dependent on the microtransaction side of the game, and very little is influenced by the Fallout part of the game.
Fair enough. But what of others - such as myself - for whom this is not their approach. As in : not even a little bit!
What I am hearing - and I concede that I may very well be reading it wrong! - is something like this : "I don't like playing the slots at the casino, and I don't think slots are very ethical, and in any case what I really want to do is play poker with my friends so . . . I'll just go back to the casino and put money in the slot machines!"
Understood like that it seems this is a problem FOR THOSE WHALE players. Yes : it is scummy that cigarette manufacturers sell poison. No : you don't have to smoke and have, in fact, (especially nowadays!) a myriad ways to get help for nicotine addiction.
Peace onto you!
I would just do a small correction to your example.
What I'm saying is: I went to vacation in a nice hotel (from a known chain) in Las Vegas - and it turned out it's scummy as hell. It keeps somewhat the atmosphere of the other branches of this hotel chain - but this (Las Vegas branch) is a scummy Casino where everything is designed to make you gamble and addicted to gambling (just like many other Casinos in Las Vegas).
Now it's your choice to listen to me, or ignore my advice.
Some people in the comments, even feel offended that I gave a negative review to this hotel, because "It's a hotel in Las Vegas, what did you expect?!".
Others feel because they're not addicted to gambling (or so they want to believe) I shouldn't be allowed to say gambling is addictive. Apparently, if it didn't happen to them - it's not true.
In any case, I'm not telling anyone what to do.
I'm not even telling anyone to read my review.
Everyone are entitled to not read my review, to read it and not believe it, to read it, believe it and choose to ignore it...
Doesn't matter - I'm still entitled to my own opinion.