Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
As for the rest. Maybe. The problem is it needs to be done in a way that's genuine instead of a representation check box. I'm not a fan, for example, of stupid things like "Nippon" in DnD or "Now we have China" in Warhammer. It feels forced for the sake of check marking. There's plenty of Japanese/Chinese/Korean only fantasy stories that never once mention any sort of Europeans (like the Wuxia genre). Yet when there are stories taken literally from Western/Eastern europe folklore, people all of a sudden want to force "representation". It's tiresome.
I wouldn't mind a gay character, or bisexual character existing. Or some black character. I just don't want it to be forced upon me, and be a natural thing that occurs.
I'd be for the inclusion of Amazons, except their whole story is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ bonkers and poorly written/awful. They're not like the amazing SIsters of Battle of 40k.
I'm glad Repanse was put in.
Yeah, OK. But now I ask you this - how do you judge if it's genuinely added or if it's 'forced'? What is the limit between 'forced' and 'natural' (your terms)??
This is what is unclear to me in all this online discourse about these topics. It seems that whenever a minority is put in a prominent position (main character, etc.), people use much more scrutiny to decide whether that character is OK or not.
My take on it is this - poorly written characters have always existed and will always continue to exist, regardless of their racial/sexual/whatever identity. Big media (hollywood, AAA publishers, etc.) has always tried to cater to what is popular and what sells. It's nothing more complicated than that. If you look back, this discourse was the same, for example, when women started appearing more in prominent roles in movies. Exactly the same as we have now. And similarly to what we have now, there were well-written characters and poorly written ones. Nothing has changed, just the focus on what will sell better, as perceived by publishers or movie producers. That's how I see it.
So, considering all that, I think we (we as in consumers or fans of a media product such as this game) would benefit much more from criticizing these additions based on how well they are written in, not what identity they have.
And let's be honest, TWWH3 is not mainly a story-driven game. Not for most players. Mechanics and gameplay are far more important. Story will always take a backseat when it comes to development time.
And another facet is catering to fans - Grand Cathay was desired by many fans, and I would say its addition was a resounding success. Sure, it still needs work, but I think the result is a net positive, no? Why can't it coexist with European-influenced factions (Empire, Bretonnia, etc.)? I say the bigger the world map, the better.
Considering they have good mechanics, LLs and a good integration mechanics-wise, would you say they were forced or naturally added?
It is common knowledge that Centigors produce the most delicious milk. Just try it sometime... trust me...
https://youtu.be/FntRpFyT7JY?si=nkn1lqyjxGuzZLwD
Cathay, however great it is, doesn't play any important or central role to Sigmar/Chaos, the MAIN THEMES OF THE GAME. Lizardmen with the grand net, High Elves with containing the Vortex. Skaven as a meme. Literally everything fits into a narrative space. You can tell which factions were inherent to the grand story and which were tacked on. Cathay is a literal "Hey we're here now" faction as a checkmark. It is incredibly easy to see if something is forced.
In terms of forcing things, a gay character WOULD be forced. How can you tell? Because there's a single set of character in the game that you actually get any sexual relation information on: Vlad and Isabella. The SINGLE example of a couple in the entire game. Everything else is completely unmentioned. Out of the game? Sure. Lots of lore.
So to "include a gay character" in WH3, that other players would KNOW is gay, would mean you'd have to insert information into the game to point it out. Something not done for any other character outside the Vampire Counts. Thus. Forced representation to check mark a box.
This isn't hard. It's not hard to tell.
Edit
To go into more detail, just wiki the Warhammer Empire/Men segments. The entire story of the origin of man in the Warhammer universe, of Teclis' tutelage. The Norscan tribes, etc... it all fits. And its all centrally located.
Cathay is just a bunch of bizarre storytelling shoved into the corner with absolutely no believable reason as to why it exists, much less has developed a culture so bizarrely different than the rest of Man in Warhammer, while also looking so vastly different in the span of Man's cannonically short time in Warhammer. It. Doesn't. Make. Sense.
Forced.
Cathay is very fun to play. But your suggestion that these "discussions" somehow can't tell what is, or isn't forced, is simply not believable.
Cathay was mentioned in old lore. I think the 6ed Lizardmen codex has a story about a Cathayan invasion fleet destroyed by Slann. Also, the humans of Cathay have been dominated by Dragons, so it makes perfect sense for them to have a completely different culture
In other words, we are not allowed to expand the world and the lore because that’s “forcing” a new narrative. Ridiculous.
Also by your logic, Vlad & Isabella’s relationship is also forced representation of heterosexuality since there aren’t any others mentioned.
Glad you cleared it up.
I agree that it shouldn’t matter to have a character’s orientation mentioend in such a game, it would be no more than a footnote in the lore text, which is barely visible at any point. So what would change if a few characters should have that mentioned in there? This is hardly a narrative driven game. It’s a sandbox, you create your own narrative with each campaign. How does it affect you if some lore tidbits mention such things?