Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Skarbrand is still the king of playing wide with Khorne, while Skulltaker... exists...? Yeah, not a fan of Skulltaker, he's boring, if Arbaal weren't released at the same time I might even be a bit upset about that. CA might even say "Arbaal saved Arbaals"... I'll get my coat.
Khorne, who never forgives anyone, just forgives him for losing.
Arbaal is the Khorne Mary Sue.
I did a campaign on L/VH, after taking your first province you can just teleport every turn to fight and spawn armies everywhere, easy full stack of Chosen and level 50 on your LL by turn 30 or earlier, while autoresolving every battle (if you pick your battles well). If you actually fight your battles, blood hosts can get work done across the map, if you refuse to like I did, they die pretty quick, as the units included in them have bad autoresolve odds.
Still weaker than Skulltaker, because his mechanic isn't as broken. Arbaal probably has the best balance of easy and fast-paced out of any campaign in the game, though. Others require manual battles, and/or get going slower than he does.
What does this have to do with the thread about him being fun to smack people with in a video game