Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'll answer it for you.
Never.
You want to actually be challenged and require tactics? Go play multiplayer.
Granted it does become a little easier to reach that point with the Beastmen since they don't have a traditional economy and their armies just flat out get stronger over time the more they destroy and there's a lot less the AI can do to weaken you. But this has been a thing ever since their update in WH2
Same is true for pretty much any doomstack in the game (for any army).
A full army of minotaurs are basically one of the most expensive armies you can field. Of course a single enemy army won't be able to match that when it has a quarter of that value.
However, it's also extremely wasteful - like using A-bombs to kill an infantry squad. It can easily be argued that fielding a full stack of minotaurs is an utter waste of resources; a misplay. And boring.
Bringing an excessive amount of force to a fight is technically a tactic - a very effective one at that.
It's no different than in Civ, bringing a much higher tech unit to fight a lower tech one
I mean compared to WH1 or 2 I feel like it's a slight upgrade giving you more variety or having more control over how difficult you want it to be.