Nippon & Ind going to be added ??

[Vargschewer]

Completed the trilogy with collection yesterday & wondering if Nippon and Ind will be added as playable armies (Mainly just want Nippon but Ind would be cool also)

Rather devs release a DLC than any mods I might add.

[Vargschewer]

Originally posted by Bane Is A Big Guy:

Originally posted by Vargschewer:

And you just said the same thing ,your like a broken record on repeat.

OK nothing else DLC wise will be released "never ever thankfully" as you say... lol

Unlike you I can read & comprehend what peoples comments say.

If you have no idea on who Bonechewer is then your WFB lore is not all up to how you think you are..something for you to look up on the net ...as it was in several WD issues. The ghoul was a horror story and myth to make it a scary character to frighten the Empire public & may or may not have had a master...don't open your door if you hear scratching on the other side.

If CA have to get permission from GW then why not? They done it for Cathay & Kislev(I'm sure kislev had older edition book anyway) I'm in process of building a Nippon army for TT & make my own units up & & rules according to what lore we have & maybe even get CREATIVE and do new stuff...if I can do that ,I'm sure game devs could possibly do the same.

Please don't reply unless your off repeating the same thing & you just wanting to get the last word in

https://warhammerfantasy.fandom.com/wiki/Bonechewer this is literally all there is on the internet for this guy, real amazing character that should 100% be in the game, such deep lore.
Kislev had a supplement for 6th ed with 6 units and 2 characters, everything else was from the old rpg's.

I'm saying the same thing, because you refuse to listen to it.
So just remember, we're more likely to get the Dogs of War, than ind/khuresh/nippon.

They're just not important enough.

Yeh well I just went off what I read about Bonechewer in White dwarf years ago and thought it interesting spooky story,was only a page and a half off memory,but it was long before Wrath of Heros pc game was out. Maybe narrow your search for white dwarf articles on it?(mid 90's to early 2000's era when WD was slimmer version)

I'm nowhere near refusing to not listen to you ,if you refer back to "I dont give a stuff" well basically I don't lol . I read the article and so need to watch youtube vid as its a waste of game/hobby/chill time. What I'm saying though for last time ,if CA/GW start a project then do it till its complete 100% as best as,as seeing & reading of lots of characters & lands not included. If they fix it so more is included,not up to you or I on forums . Lazy or not I dunno but the old world should be just that all of it ,if they attempt to encompass all factions.

I see DoW not really important enough also ,but could be included as merc for some factions ,like Empire or Cathay. A unit would be easier to implement than a army though

Been busy reading Nippon army books on the net & lots of details that could be used like Cathay was introduced..just saying. I have the Cathay army book also printed & cross over units for my TT Nippon . Like near 110 pages in one PDF(the colour versions the better of both)

So if they are included or not ...who gives a stuff ...But all ways finish what you start to the best of your ability.

[Bane Is A Big Guy]

Originally posted by Vargschewer:

Yeh well I just went off what I read about Bonechewer in White dwarf years ago and thought it interesting spooky story,was only a page and a half off memory,but it was long before Wrath of Heros pc game was out. Maybe narrow your search for white dwarf articles on it?(mid 90's to early 2000's era when WD was slimmer version)

I'm nowhere near refusing to not listen to you ,if you refer back to "I dont give a stuff" well basically I don't lol . I read the article and so need to watch youtube vid as its a waste of game/hobby/chill time. What I'm saying though for last time ,if CA/GW start a project then do it till its complete 100% as best as,as seeing & reading of lots of characters & lands not included. If they fix it so more is included,not up to you or I on forums . Lazy or not I dunno but the old world should be just that all of it ,if they attempt to encompass all factions.

I see DoW not really important enough also ,but could be included as merc for some factions ,like Empire or Cathay. A unit would be easier to implement than a army though

Been busy reading Nippon army books on the net & lots of details that could be used like Cathay was introduced..just saying. I have the Cathay army book also printed & cross over units for my TT Nippon . Like near 110 pages in one PDF(the colour versions the better of both)

So if they are included or not ...who gives a stuff ...But all ways finish what you start to the best of your ability.

It'll be mostly finished when Dogs of War are added.

All your nippon books are just fanmade, which they wont use.

And man, the fact that bonechewer has absolutely nothing, except for that one page I sent you probably means he never existed before that. Considering all the fan wikis are pretty comprehensive.

Keep reaching for those never appearing factions though. I hear there's some good mods for them.

[Vargschewer]

Originally posted by Bane Is A Big Guy:

Originally posted by Vargschewer:

Yeh well I just went off what I read about Bonechewer in White dwarf years ago and thought it interesting spooky story,was only a page and a half off memory,but it was long before Wrath of Heros pc game was out. Maybe narrow your search for white dwarf articles on it?(mid 90's to early 2000's era when WD was slimmer version)

I'm nowhere near refusing to not listen to you ,if you refer back to "I dont give a stuff" well basically I don't lol . I read the article and so need to watch youtube vid as its a waste of game/hobby/chill time. What I'm saying though for last time ,if CA/GW start a project then do it till its complete 100% as best as,as seeing & reading of lots of characters & lands not included. If they fix it so more is included,not up to you or I on forums . Lazy or not I dunno but the old world should be just that all of it ,if they attempt to encompass all factions.

I see DoW not really important enough also ,but could be included as merc for some factions ,like Empire or Cathay. A unit would be easier to implement than a army though

Been busy reading Nippon army books on the net & lots of details that could be used like Cathay was introduced..just saying. I have the Cathay army book also printed & cross over units for my TT Nippon . Like near 110 pages in one PDF(the colour versions the better of both)

So if they are included or not ...who gives a stuff ...But all ways finish what you start to the best of your ability.

It'll be mostly finished when Dogs of War are added.

All your nippon books are just fanmade, which they wont use.

And man, the fact that bonechewer has absolutely nothing, except for that one page I sent you probably means he never existed before that. Considering all the fan wikis are pretty comprehensive.

Keep reaching for those never appearing factions though. I hear there's some good mods for them.

Bonechewer is a mysterious myth told to scare the people, Guess you will have to take my word for it from reading White dwarf..like I said the internet is not all ways 100% correct/true.

Not really into mods for games as old school and prefer a full game release instead of drips & drabs..normally don't get them games & only bought TWW3 to complete collection as have the collectors editions for 1 & 2

They basically used the Cathay fan made book for Cathay & I printed that out years ago when the net started to become the norm ..no harm in doing more I think ,but that's up to GW/CA

DoW "never ever thankfully" lol

[Bane Is A Big Guy]

DoW are at least relevant, ind/khuresh/nippon are not.

I doubt they used the fan made book for cathay.

[jonoliveira12]

Originally posted by Bane Is A Big Guy:

Originally posted by Vargschewer:

And you just said the same thing ,your like a broken record on repeat.

OK nothing else DLC wise will be released "never ever thankfully" as you say... lol

Unlike you I can read & comprehend what peoples comments say.

If you have no idea on who Bonechewer is then your WFB lore is not all up to how you think you are..something for you to look up on the net ...as it was in several WD issues. The ghoul was a horror story and myth to make it a scary character to frighten the Empire public & may or may not have had a master...don't open your door if you hear scratching on the other side.

If CA have to get permission from GW then why not? They done it for Cathay & Kislev(I'm sure kislev had older edition book anyway) I'm in process of building a Nippon army for TT & make my own units up & & rules according to what lore we have & maybe even get CREATIVE and do new stuff...if I can do that ,I'm sure game devs could possibly do the same.

Please don't reply unless your off repeating the same thing & you just wanting to get the last word in

https://warhammerfantasy.fandom.com/wiki/Bonechewer this is literally all there is on the internet for this guy, real amazing character that should 100% be in the game, such deep lore.
Kislev had a supplement for 6th ed with 6 units and 2 characters, everything else was from the old rpg's.

I'm saying the same thing, because you refuse to listen to it.
So just remember, we're more likely to get the Dogs of War, than ind/khuresh/nippon.

They're just not important enough.

We are FOR SURE getting Daogs of War, as not only are there files for them, but we got Golg too, and he play EXACTLY like you would expect a DoW army to.

[Vargschewer]

Originally posted by Bane Is A Big Guy:

DoW are at least relevant, ind/khuresh/nippon are not.

I doubt they used the fan made book for cathay.

"Basically" I said , the difference between official & fan made in minimal with lore entries /rules /stats/characters etc


Not to mention GW use of real life lands/maps & characters,but that's history & what I like most about WFB the use of some real things put into fantasy, some copies for sure ,but that's what gives it a realistic feel .

[Vargschewer]

Originally posted by jonoliveira12:

Originally posted by Bane Is A Big Guy:

https://warhammerfantasy.fandom.com/wiki/Bonechewer this is literally all there is on the internet for this guy, real amazing character that should 100% be in the game, such deep lore.
Kislev had a supplement for 6th ed with 6 units and 2 characters, everything else was from the old rpg's.

I'm saying the same thing, because you refuse to listen to it.
So just remember, we're more likely to get the Dogs of War, than ind/khuresh/nippon.

They're just not important enough.

We are FOR SURE getting Daogs of War, as not only are there files for them, but we got Golg too, and he play EXACTLY like you would expect a DoW army to.

Whole army or just units?

[Darklordnj]

Originally posted by Bane Is A Big Guy:

DoW are at least relevant, ind/khuresh/nippon are not.

I doubt they used the fan made book for cathay.

They didn’t. GW specifically made an 8th edition book specific to Cathay, it was brought up in a pre-release interview with GW/CA for Warhammer 3. No idea where OP keeps getting this GW used/could use fan-made stuff when they haven’t and will never. GW wants strict control over the IP (at least as far as the tabletop goes) using fan made stuff would go against that.

[Vargschewer]

Originally posted by Darklordnj:

Originally posted by Bane Is A Big Guy:

DoW are at least relevant, ind/khuresh/nippon are not.

I doubt they used the fan made book for cathay.

They didn’t. GW specifically made an 8th edition book specific to Cathay, it was brought up in a pre-release interview with GW/CA for Warhammer 3. No idea where OP keeps getting this GW used/could use fan-made stuff when they haven’t and will never. GW wants strict control over the IP (at least as far as the tabletop goes) using fan made stuff would go against that.

Just saying GW use ideas from real world myths & legends of history for their lore into WFB & of course ideas from modern novels like LotR, reason why they had to change some names of units so GW could patent them & own the rights.

GW have been knocking ideas off since the start ,do I care ..no as it's cool crossovers. How do you know in specific they don't source material online ,when most of the lore & characters are rip off's of other material, just saying its a common fact, So why would not get some material off fan based ideas & implement them into official books/lore. Seen lots of units in my fan made Cathay that are used in TWW3(only had a look & game of them today...but then again its just basic military feudal units anyway)

For instance Bonechewer is some thing like the Nosferatu character except a Ghoul..could name others but no need if you get my drift .

[Dugaul]

I would Rather BOLOGS!

but clearly there is land to fill up towards the east so yea Ind and a mk and a tiger person was leaked ages back no?

[jonoliveira12]

Originally posted by Dugaul:

I would Rather BOLOGS!

but clearly there is land to fill up towards the east so yea Ind and a mk and a tiger person was leaked ages back no?

The leaks were false, just LegendofTotalWar ragebaiting.

[Darklordnj]

Originally posted by Dugaul:

I would Rather BOLOGS!

but clearly there is land to fill up towards the east so yea Ind and a mk and a tiger person was leaked ages back no?

Tigermen would fall under Cathay, if they do show up. It’s more likely that the Monkey King gets slotted there in addition to some Chaos lord.

[Threetails]

I think it's likely we get DoW given that they have a racial capitol. IDK if we get them first or not but I think DoW are very likely.

People are saying that Ind and Khuresh are unlikely, but IMO given that they are on the map I would guess CA had actually probably planned to add them into the game on initial launch. I mean, just look at the map.

https://content.totalwar.com/total-war/com.totalwar.www2019/uploads/2022/06/17110402/wh3_dlc_ie_parchment_map_english.jpg

In the bottom right, Ind and Khuresh take up landmass maybe even larger than Lustria. In TWWH2 CA expanded into the area that had been unaccessable like that over time. I would be surprised if they hadn't originally planned to do the same with TWWH3.

People are saying if there's not an armybook it cant exist and stuff, but we have a lot of factions in the game that aren't strictly their own faction, for example Norsca, Chaos Dwarves, and Vampire Coast. On top of that factions have been written in basically just got TWWH3. We can't sit here and be like, "Ind/Khuresh aren't a tabletop faction!" when a bunch of stuff in the game isn't really official tabletop content.

I genuinely think its difficult to look at the map and say that CA wasn't planning Ind/Khuresh at some point in the game. Why are they there on the map if CA wasn't planning them. That being said, I imagine that after the lackluster launch I wouldn't be hugely surprised if CA is more leery or a risky investment like Ind/Khuresh. If the next few DLC sell like hotcakes, though, we may get them.

That being said, with Nippon not on the map, IMO Nippon has like 0% probability.

[Bane Is A Big Guy]

Originally posted by Threetails:

I think it's likely we get DoW given that they have a racial capitol. IDK if we get them first or not but I think DoW are very likely.

People are saying that Ind and Khuresh are unlikely, but IMO given that they are on the map I would guess CA had actually probably planned to add them into the game on initial launch. I mean, just look at the map.

https://content.totalwar.com/total-war/com.totalwar.www2019/uploads/2022/06/17110402/wh3_dlc_ie_parchment_map_english.jpg

In the bottom right, Ind and Khuresh take up landmass maybe even larger than Lustria. In TWWH2 CA expanded into the area that had been unaccessable like that over time. I would be surprised if they hadn't originally planned to do the same with TWWH3.

People are saying if there's not an armybook it cant exist and stuff, but we have a lot of factions in the game that aren't strictly their own faction, for example Norsca, Chaos Dwarves, and Vampire Coast. On top of that factions have been written in basically just got TWWH3. We can't sit here and be like, "Ind/Khuresh aren't a tabletop faction!" when a bunch of stuff in the game isn't really official tabletop content.

I genuinely think its difficult to look at the map and say that CA wasn't planning Ind/Khuresh at some point in the game. Why are they there on the map if CA wasn't planning them. That being said, I imagine that after the lackluster launch I wouldn't be hugely surprised if CA is more leery or a risky investment like Ind/Khuresh. If the next few DLC sell like hotcakes, though, we may get them.

That being said, with Nippon not on the map, IMO Nippon has like 0% probability.

That part of the map has always been there and duly ignored.
Vampire Coast had stuff from the Dreadfleet game and Luthor Harkon has been around since atleast 5th edition Lizardmen lore.
Chaos Dwarfs had an army book and Norsca have been a part of Warriors of Chaos for ages.

[[503]Stannis The Mannis]

Originally posted by Threetails:

People are saying that Ind and Khuresh are unlikely, but IMO given that they are on the map I would guess CA had actually probably planned to add them into the game on initial launch. I mean, just look at the map.

Araby has been in the map since game 2 and yet we have no Araby so what makes you think that Ind and Kuresh would be different? Especially when they are far less important.