Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Would have enough races and factions in it to prop them up for at least one more 10 year trilogy. And people would lap it up all over again.
So realistically they could drop both at the same time.
I would…I would prob be down to clown with that tbh. I’d personally want it to be based on 3/4 era of games tho…not what came after
Both are fantasy and the battles would be broken down to the same thing.
It would largely be a reskin of what we already have for Warhammer, so I feel it's unlikely. Just not enough variety. Same with a LotR one (if they ever even got the rights...)