Why do Daemonettes not have nipples shown?

[Atma]

The age rating restriction is 16, so there can be nipples here.
And before anyone says that it's because GW, why doesn't tabletop models not have nipples? Warhammer is supposed to be a dark ravaged world, where all kinds of degenerate stuff happens, so why is GW so afraid to add correct anatomy?

[Funky Monk]

Originally posted by 'nitzen:

Originally posted by Ainess:

Yes, it really, really does when it is 100% logical and appropriate given the context.

"WHAAAA...??! The female succubi-like demons of a chaos god whose trademark is sex, including rape, and all their possible permutations with torture, bestiality, child molestation and anything and everything in-between should have visible nipples?! Oh mar gorsh, inconceivably childish!"

EDIT: Also, maybe get yourself checked out, Mr. "I am all for gore and guts, but OMG nipples, eww."

Violence in video games, and the oversexualization of everything, everywhere in todays society is not even remotely the same, in games or otherwise. You understand full well that my post is not just about pixelated nipples.

Bruh why do you complain about violencein video games in a TW forum.

['nitzen]

Originally posted by Ainess:

Originally posted by 'nitzen:

Violence in video games, and the oversexualization of everything, everywhere in todays society is not even remotely the same, in games or otherwise. You understand full well that my post is not just about pixelated nipples.

Of course it´s not the same, violence is objectively harmful and bad, whereas sex is natural, necessary, and (predominantly) healthy and wholesome.

You should understand that you need to be venting your misguided virtue-signalling elsewhere and not under a post that asks for something 100% logical and reasonable and befitting the setting.

Have you heard of Twitter? They love this woke rhetoric over there I hear.

And belitteling women, portraing them as sex objects isn't? There is nothing natural about sexuality in todays media.

Also, dude, please stop trying to belittle me. Yes I lost if for a second and in the totally wrong forum, ok? Now please stop and lay off with the ruler techniques.

[Funky Monk]

Originally posted by 'nitzen:

Originally posted by Ainess:

Of course it´s not the same, violence is objectively harmful and bad, whereas sex is natural, necessary, and (predominantly) healthy and wholesome.

You should understand that you need to be venting your misguided virtue-signalling elsewhere and not under a post that asks for something 100% logical and reasonable and befitting the setting.

Have you heard of Twitter? They love this woke rhetoric over there I hear.

And belitteling women, portraing them as sex objects isn't? There is nothing natural about sexuality in todays media.

Also, dude, please stop trying to belittle me. Yes I lost if for a second and in the totally wrong forum, ok? Now please stop and lay off with the ruler techniques.

Daemonettes are not women, they are daemons

[Ainess]

Originally posted by 'nitzen:

Originally posted by Ainess:

Of course it´s not the same, violence is objectively harmful and bad, whereas sex is natural, necessary, and (predominantly) healthy and wholesome.

You should understand that you need to be venting your misguided virtue-signalling elsewhere and not under a post that asks for something 100% logical and reasonable and befitting the setting.

Have you heard of Twitter? They love this woke rhetoric over there I hear.

And belitteling women, portraing them as sex objects isn't? There is nothing natural about sexuality in todays media.

Also, dude, please stop trying to belittle me. Yes I lost if for a second and in the totally wrong forum, ok? Now please stop and lay off with the ruler techniques.

That´s fair, we all misfire our frustrations at times

[Totally Not Myers]

Originally posted by Funky Monk:

Originally posted by 'nitzen:

And belitteling women, portraing them as sex objects isn't? There is nothing natural about sexuality in todays media.

Also, dude, please stop trying to belittle me. Yes I lost if for a second and in the totally wrong forum, ok? Now please stop and lay off with the ruler techniques.

Daemonettes are not women, they are daemons

And also sexually amorphous

[Lamp]

Because OP, it's okay to sexualize non-human multi/non-gendered daemons, but to sexualize a human- and with a gender! Well that's crossing lines. Heaven forbid some of the daemons be predominantly male or female and sexual in any way (if it's not specifically part of their character like Morathi.) What if children saw? Won't you please think of the children! How would CA explain it to them? (besides the rating.)

Only creatures of hazy or no gender are allowed to put out any kind of sexual vibe.


/s obviously. But yeah, for reals? CA is pretty toothless, 0 edge. WH3 Slaanesh is some PG13 ♥♥♥♥.

Edit: To be clear, I don't care about the nipple situation. Just found it odd that there's only one 'ultragender' to nearly all of Slaanesh's troops. I thought there would be a mix of all options so it seemed odd.

[Darx]

Originally posted by Kubers:

No guts on Nurgle
No tits on Slaanesh
No blood for Khorne
Chaos s*cks now

this

[Diggy G]

Originally posted by 'nitzen:

Originally posted by Ainess:

Of course it´s not the same, violence is objectively harmful and bad, whereas sex is natural, necessary, and (predominantly) healthy and wholesome.

You should understand that you need to be venting your misguided virtue-signalling elsewhere and not under a post that asks for something 100% logical and reasonable and befitting the setting.

Have you heard of Twitter? They love this woke rhetoric over there I hear.

And belitteling women, portraing them as sex objects isn't? There is nothing natural about sexuality in todays media.

Also, dude, please stop trying to belittle me. Yes I lost if for a second and in the totally wrong forum, ok? Now please stop and lay off with the ruler techniques.

If you're this upset about some digital demons showing a bit of flesh, I'd hate to hear what you think about Onlyfans.

[DasaKamov]

Originally posted by Kubers:

No guts on Nurgle
No tits on Slaanesh
No blood for Khorne
Chaos s*cks now

Excerpt from Chapter 3 of "The Edgelord's Book of Grudges".

Also, it's hilarious that the poster self-censored the word "sucks" in this context.

[Lamp]

Not really very edgy, just regular. The other direction to go is 'toothless' and that's where CA went.

[Totally Not Myers]

Originally posted by Darx:

Originally posted by Kubers:

No guts on Nurgle
No tits on Slaanesh
No blood for Khorne
Chaos s*cks now

this

I'm sure modders will fix this come workshop release.

[Darderus]

Just wait until we get mod support. We're gonna be getting a lot more than nipples :)

[Kamfrenchie]

I m more bothered with all of them being uniboob, without variation.

Also we've had barechested men in a lot of game without problem, why are people always ignoring this when speaking about nipple ?

[Atma]

Originally posted by Kamfrenchie:

Also we've had barechested men in a lot of game without problem, why are people always ignoring this when speaking about nipple ?

If I wanted to see male nipples, I'd take off my shirt.
That said Warhammer does have male nipples on Daemon Prince, for example. Which is ironic since the very same Daemon Prince doesn't have nipples on his own loading splash Screen. CA are simply sexists who think that showing barechasted men (Slayers for example) is a cool thing to do, but when it comes to women, then it's a no no.
Sexist pigs.

[Knight of Slaanesh]

It really looks a lot like censorship, unfortunately. Give me my tits, please. And what also bothers me, the chaos realm of Slaanesh seriously lacks the enticingly beautiful part. Only a mix of seafood and body horror fusion is shown.