Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I don't think CA should be breaking lore just to appease your meaningless multiplayer campaign.
What I dont understand is when a human player plays karl franz and another plays Draken why is she no longer fidelity to franz and says she is not an elector count.
Just like you cannot give Middenland to Todbringer once he lost it to the beastmen you cannot give Elspeth the title of elector of Nuln.
And that’s because the elector counts mechanic is available only for Franz, just like the Imperial armoury exists only for Elspeth.
By playing Franz and Elspeth you and your friend are effectively gimping your strength long term. Franz and Throrgrim or Louen would make a better match up; If you want to keep playing two empire faction, one of you could take up Gelt or Wulfarth or even Volkmar