Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I don't have any issues with your views on creative assembly, you just are getting very worked up about things that don't matter, like getting overly aggressive internet tough guy about not being direct quoted by someone.
I don't care about multiplayer either way.
Also:
I have no idea what this is referencing. Do you think the idea that fans influence their fandom is revelatory? Do you believe you're the first to ever make that observation? That's been the case since people have consumed stories.
I love when people like you will try to throw around stuff like calling someone else an internet tough guy, which just shows that you're completely out of actual arguments to make.
And don't play dumb dude, you know exactly what I'm talking about.
You know that I'm talking about how most fans will try to not acknowledge their hand in CA possibly going under, as much as anything they or Sega may have done.
I know that some other people have made that observation, but it still holds up because most people won't acknowledge their part in something bad.
wait, what?
gonna use some bold as you love it.
are you saying the fans would be the reason the company went bankrupt ?
...
I hope i'm misunderstanding you.
I said that they're part of the reason that a company can go bankrupt, not that CA is going or has gone bankrupt.
Sorry, but like it or not, the fans can have a negative impact on the course of a company's livelihood and all that.
And while I do believe a lot of CA's more recent problems can probably be tied to Sega's meddling, it wasn't them who boycotted Pharaoh and all.
The whole Hyenas thing just stinks of Sega making CA work on some weird gimmicky FPS game rather than the people at CA being all for it.
It would be fairly easy for Sega to position themselves to not be in the blast radius of situations that could go either way, but not be so far from it that they couldn't swoop in and take some of the credit for themselves if the project was successful.
Well, I do think that the whole gimmick of zero G FPS game could have some promise, it could've at least been a decently interesting FPS game, but I feel like Sega probably forced CA into putting so much of their resources into that game and only giving them so much time to do make it in.
It would have released alongside The Finals. This probably would have been a mess.
What were the Finals exactly? Or do you just mean like it was a crunch time put on them by Sega?
Because I do feel like if Sega only gave them so much time to create a whole new game, then it would've been all the harder for CA to pull off.
I think it would've been great if Sega had just been smart and had CA make another "Total Warrior" game, like Spartan Total Warrior and or Viking: Battle for Asgard, or just a remake of the latter.
It's another extraction class-based shooter but with multiple teams (I think Hyenas would have been 2 teams only, but I don't know a lot about the game).
OH NOOOOOOO...! Anyway... *Goes back to playing Medieval 2*
Not directed at you Elite but in general, Its actually pretty decent and F2P.
CA needed to start Hyenas some years ago to have had a chance.
Look at Concord.