Total War: WARHAMMER III

Total War: WARHAMMER III

View Stats:
Taijin Apr 22, 2024 @ 11:04pm
Will there be any new contents for Orge kingdom future ?
For the sake of great maw pls
< >
Showing 1-15 of 16 comments
OpalGotMyHeart Apr 22, 2024 @ 11:13pm 
your guess is as good as anyone elses at this point, but imo, probably not, greesus is kind of THE ogre for the faction, and outside of chaos ogres i dont know what theyd have to add.
Originally posted by NikiGotUrSpine:
your guess is as good as anyone elses at this point, but imo, probably not, greesus is kind of THE ogre for the faction, and outside of chaos ogres i dont know what theyd have to add.

https://whfb.lexicanum.com/wiki/List_of_Ogre_Kingdoms_units
Sadly according to the wiki from the various army books they really don't have much left to to add outside of ♥♥♥♥ like gnobblar slingers which would just be a knockoff of skaven slingers.

Honestly what ogres need isn't more units or content what they desperately need is a faction mechanic rework. I feel like ogres would have worked better with something closer to the old style of horde factions, the tempts NEED to be movable, though I feel that it makes plenty of sense that the ogres established economy is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ because in lore thats how it works.

They spend so much time eating and its all they care about which leaves little time for infrastructure/farming/trade so It would also make sense to expand the contracts mechanic, give the ability to offer to join a war for a faction and give big reward bonuses for capturing certain settlements of the enemy etc.
Butcher Apr 23, 2024 @ 12:12am 
CA said "no DLCs for DLCs"
Pseudok Apr 23, 2024 @ 12:16am 
Originally posted by Butcher:
CA said "no DLCs for DLCs"

... like Wood Elves and Beastmen?
Ashley Apr 23, 2024 @ 12:28am 
Originally posted by Butcher:
CA said "no DLCs for DLCs"
You're like 4 years late on this
Butcher Apr 23, 2024 @ 12:34am 
Originally posted by Pseudok:
Originally posted by Butcher:
CA said "no DLCs for DLCs"

... like Wood Elves and Beastmen?
Originally posted by Ashley:
Originally posted by Butcher:
CA said "no DLCs for DLCs"
You're like 4 years late on this
CA would never do this guys, stop joking.
Conflagration Apr 23, 2024 @ 1:47am 
Absolutely there could be - they're very obviously missing three pieces of content from their 8th edition army book - the Bruiser hero, the Thundertusk and Yhetees.

They also could get things like Blood Vultures (which was essentially a missile attack for Hunter heroes but absolutely could be turned into a unit of fliers), Mournfang Riders with Pistols (an optional unit upgrade), Cragbeasts (massive, bear-like creatures) and maybe a few new things not taken from lore.

Characterwise they've got plenty to work with too - Ghark Ironskin, an Ogre Tyrant in full plate armour who rides a mechanical Rhinox, ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ Maneater, the Ogre for whom all Maneaters are named after, and Jhared the Red, the first Hunter. Plus Bragg the Gutsman as a LH.
Butcher Apr 23, 2024 @ 2:25am 
Originally posted by Aas:
- ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ Maneater
I suspect he gonna be renamed to Goldfang in case he gets added
Aas Apr 23, 2024 @ 2:26am 
From the beginning they had an obvious DLC sized hole cut into them:

Originally posted by Neurotoxin:
[...] the Bruiser hero, the Thundertusk and Yhetees.

- Ghark Ironskin
- Golg f a g Maneater
- Bragg the Gutsman

+ some Gnoblar units, Blood Vultures etc.


...if they are still going to get the DLC though after CA realized "we don't always want so big DLCs" who knows.
Last edited by Aas; Apr 23, 2024 @ 2:27am
zefyris Apr 23, 2024 @ 2:49am 
"no DLC for DLC" is technically still a policy they have. "No DLC for DLC" doesn't mean what you think it means. It means "no DLC that would require to own another DLC to work".
Wood Elves, Beastmen are DLC races sure, but you don't need to own them to play the Sisters of Twillight and Taurox; as if you buy just those, you will still be able to use all the base units provided by the original DLC; just not play as the original LLs.

It would be a "DLC for a DLC" if that wasn't the case and that you only had like the 4 units added by their DLC to play as unless you owned the original DLC as well(which obviously would de facto make it mandatory for playing the Sisters of Twillight and Taurox to own their respective orginal race DLC from WH1).

So that would be the same for an Ogre Kingdom addition. As long as you can play as the added OK LL without having to own the original OK DLC, having access to all units, then it's not a DLC for DLC and therefore it is compliant with CA's DLC policy.

-----------------------
And to answer OP, unless they stop making DLCs for WH3 earlier than they themselves originally expected, they will definitely make another Ogre DLC. its centerpieces would logically be the Thundertusk and Rhinox riders, and then it could add other stuff like Yhetees, and 2 gnoblar units for example, so very easy to fill 5 units; and they have 3 known character available so it's easy to have both a LL and a LH added as well as slaughtermaster regular lords, and ogre hunter regular hero for example.

Honnestly, even with the new standard 1LL 1 LH 1 regular hero 1 regular lord 5 units, oK's GW roster has everything it needs to fill all those slots in an additional DLC.


...And that's really all you need to know to understand that YES, CA fully intended to have at least one of such DLC down the line. Did or will their plans change, no one know, your guess is as good as mine.
Chances are very high we'll get it imo.
Last edited by zefyris; Apr 23, 2024 @ 3:00am
Conflagration Apr 23, 2024 @ 3:09am 
Originally posted by Butcher:
Originally posted by Aas:
- ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ Maneater
I suspect he gonna be renamed to Goldfang in case he gets added
He's not going to be renamed, this is something I see constantly spouted and it's complete nonsense with no basis.

He's been called since the first few editions. The term is much more often used to refer to cigarettes than as a slur in the UK (where both CA and GW are). And, as of now there are already 2 names in game that end the same as him, one of which was added only last year with the Chaos Dwarfs.

Originally posted by zefyris:
"no DLC for DLC" is technically still a policy they have. "No DLC for DLC" doesn't mean what you think it means. It means "no DLC that would require to own another DLC to work".
Wood Elves, Beastmen are DLC races sure, but you don't need to own them to play the Sisters of Twillight and Taurox; as if you buy just those, you will still be able to use all the base units provided by the original DLC; just not play as the original LLs.

It would be a "DLC for a DLC" if that wasn't the case and that you only had like the 4 units added by their DLC to play as unless you owned the original DLC as well(which obviously would de facto make it mandatory for playing the Sisters of Twillight and Taurox to own their respective orginal race DLC from WH1).

So that would be the same for an Ogre Kingdom addition. As long as you can play as the added OK LL without having to own the original OK DLC, having access to all units, then it's not a DLC for DLC and therefore it is compliant with CA's DLC policy.

-----------------------
And to answer OP, unless they stop making DLCs for WH3 earlier than they themselves originally expected, they will definitely make another Ogre DLC. its centerpieces would logically be the Thundertusk and Rhinox riders, and then it could add other stuff like Yhetees, and 2 gnoblar units for example, so very easy to fill 5 units; and they have 3 known character available so it's easy to have both a LL and a LH added as well as slaughtermaster regular lords, and ogre hunter regular hero for example.

Honnestly, even with the new standard 1LL 1 LH 1 regular hero 1 regular lord 5 units, oK's GW roster has everything it needs to fill all those slots in an additional DLC.


...And that's really all you need to know to understand that YES, CA fully intended to have at least one of such DLC down the line. Did or will their plans change, no one know, your guess is as good as mine.
Chances are very high we'll get it imo.
Rhinox Riders are already in game, they're just called Crushers.
Last edited by Conflagration; Apr 23, 2024 @ 3:11am
lethminite Apr 23, 2024 @ 3:39am 
Originally posted by zefyris:
"no DLC for DLC" is technically still a policy they have. "No DLC for DLC" doesn't mean what you think it means. It means "no DLC that would require to own another DLC to work".
Technically they broke it with drycha, since FLC is a type of DLC, and she was FLC for DLC, so a type of DLC for DLC.
They still followed the policy in spirit, since they really meant "you won't need to pay for any old DLC for any new paid DLC to work". So I don't think it really matters. But in a trivial way, they did technically do DLC for DLC.
Conflagration Apr 23, 2024 @ 3:47am 
Originally posted by lethminite:
Originally posted by zefyris:
"no DLC for DLC" is technically still a policy they have. "No DLC for DLC" doesn't mean what you think it means. It means "no DLC that would require to own another DLC to work".
Technically they broke it with drycha, since FLC is a type of DLC, and she was FLC for DLC, so a type of DLC for DLC.
They still followed the policy in spirit, since they really meant "you won't need to pay for any old DLC for any new paid DLC to work". So I don't think it really matters. But in a trivial way, they did technically do DLC for DLC.
They did that long before Drycha - Morghur was retroactively added to Call of the Beastmen.
Elitewrecker PT Apr 23, 2024 @ 3:58am 
And bone giant to TK
zefyris Apr 23, 2024 @ 7:55am 
Originally posted by lethminite:
Originally posted by zefyris:
"no DLC for DLC" is technically still a policy they have. "No DLC for DLC" doesn't mean what you think it means. It means "no DLC that would require to own another DLC to work".
Technically they broke it with drycha, since FLC is a type of DLC, and she was FLC for DLC, so a type of DLC for DLC.
They still followed the policy in spirit, since they really meant "you won't need to pay for any old DLC for any new paid DLC to work". So I don't think it really matters. But in a trivial way, they did technically do DLC for DLC.
They call free DLC FLC, so when they say no dlc for dlc, that's obviously only about paid DLC. The whole point of that rule is to not have paid content that requires another paid DLC content on top of owning the game. What you're calling DLC for DLC is just content addition for a prior DLC, and you know it.
Last edited by zefyris; Apr 23, 2024 @ 9:18am
< >
Showing 1-15 of 16 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Apr 22, 2024 @ 11:04pm
Posts: 16