Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That's bugged on Steam, the video has 102k views.
Yeah, a WWI TW game seems weird. It'd have to be radically different from past TW games to not just feel like someone just slapped a WWI skin on Empire or FotS. Line infantry cannot work unless you just pretend for some reason there's less firepower than FotS. Even in late game in FotS the traditional formula for TW starts to break down due to the sheer amount of firepower, and that's without bolt-action rifles, without machine guns, and without 20th century artillery.
I hope this doesn't turn into another cancelled project. I could easily see that happening after they put a build together and realize there's no way to make it work.
Is that some big picutre stuff? There ist just a link for me
Don't care.
a ww1 game will either be a slow game where there is little to no movement on the campaign map or it will be very unrealistic and undeserving of the historical tag.
if this is true than im guessing that it will be the second total war game i skip
goes streight to youtube, you knowm, like a link
In my standard browser