Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Este tema ha sido cerrado 
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
How do you measure performance?
If you dont like DLSS. Dont use it. I love DLSS and it improve my framerate in every game ive used it in.
Chill guys
Thats not exactly true.
Dlss is not on/off thing. It is an algorythm, that is created by nvidia, on nvidia supercomputers, that is implemented into nvidia drivers to work with SPECIFIC GAME. Not into the game.
Ca would need to ask nvidia to create such algoritm (which they probably did), then test its effectivness (which probably turned out low), and then implement it into drivers (which would damage dlss teademark if it is not a miracle +20 fps tech).
Game developers cant just enable dlss.
Because they are not the ones creating it.
Also dlss doesnt like strategy games. That is why it is not implemented in strategy games. It needs predictable frame. Strategy games have too unpredictable frames and too much variation.
If someone doesnt implement dlss it means it doesnt work well. Also you need to remake algoritm with every dlc. That means you need new nvidia drivers every dlc just for your game. Its good for complete titles, but with game that has dlc every 6 months thats a lot of work.
Also mods will be a problem, because they will use extra assets, like models and textures that dlss will not recognize.
Thats why skyrim doesnt use dlss. You cant have mods and dlss. And i prefer to have mods.
Cyberpunk has mods. Your entire argument fell apart.
Cyberpunk does not have modding support. At least not official. Thats why there is no workshop. Warhammer has workshop. The difference is that CDP doesnt care if workshop works. Ca does.
Cyberpunk is an fps game. Dlss works good with those. It also has something to do with the fact that you dont actually see things that you mod. Main issue are assets. It is not a problem because you dont see jacket, dress or whateveryou modded.
Weapons you hold also dont count because they are not subject to dlss I believe. Something about different planes and wallcliping.
By all means, please find me a strategy game with dlss and mods.
You can literally toggle DLSS on or OFF.
Everything you've said in this thread is either incorrect or inaccurate. You don't really know what you're talking about.
DLSS only works on 'corridor based games' because you can predict the frames??? - utter nonsense.
Tofu mean a settings toggle in game whether to have DLSS enabled or not. I have no clue why you went on a big tangent about explaining how it works (which you were incorrect with in multiple instances).
I will also like to point out that there are official modding tools coming to Cyberpunk 2077. Mount and Blade II: Bannerlord also has DLSS AND official modding tools. So you're baseless argument about games with mods not having DLSS is unfounded. It was a ridiculous claim in the first place.
Finally, just because no current strategy game has DLSS doesn't mean one can't in the future. Previously there was NO GAME EVER that had DLSS so what's your point?
0%? What?? Facepalm.
Yup, why I asked the below.
This is why I left at this point.
Gave you some points for saying my thoughts though lol
Also for people saying dlss is a waste.
Try it at 4k with everything on ultra.
It's not the CPU bottle necking you.
(And yes you can turn things down but the fact remains, you can't max this game at 4k)
I suggest both of you chill.
In the end it doesnt matter if any of us is right or wrong, because if dlss is to be in final realease it has already been implemented.
We will find out in roughly 40 days. Untill then please find a different outlet for your "facepalms".
pretty sure he is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ with us, i don't think something with that amount of development time would be worth the time and effort.
I am chill? Just because someone points out falsehoods and corrects the things you present as facts to be wrong doesn't make me angry and/or mean.
Presenting false info simply misinforms others. Some may not know what DLSS is so they check out this thread only to find incorrect information which they presume to be correct.
Doing a little research before presenting your argument is the best way to go these days.