Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I also play total war warhammer, the trilogy that actually matters, and I don't think your suggestions would improve the game.
People complained about not enough points to unlock everything back in warhammer 2, so CA raised the level cap.
Maybe I'm not understanding because I'm not an enlightened EU4 player like yourself. Do explain oh game design genius, maybe make another graph of made up numbers as a visual aid.
Also stop using arguments ad-persona it has nothing to do with the fact that the only thing that you proven so far is that it would make players spend a bit more time in the charatec screen lvling up mages. Other things are just based on personal preferences and I can't argue with that.
I play strategy games to strategize not to play the game excatly the same every single time because it is the only viable strategy and that is get the mage and give him 1 good spell that kills enitre enemy armies. That's why the game is so boring after turn 30, because there is nothing else to do you already have an economy and mage in every army and most likely can win with every opponent. That's why even if i really want to play this game i can't because i can't get engaged as the wizards solves all of my issue because of their riddiculles power creep in lvling them up.
Good luck convincing CA to try it out though.