Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
- look at the lore
- how kingdoms/empires worked in the past (including their conflicts & wars)
- gameplay, all races have their "civil war", but not the mechanics like empire.
- and last but not least... it is stupid humanity, we have problems, lets go to war...
and most empire players that cry how bad civil war is, you play it wrong in my eyes. just don't go the asap confederate or conquer everything route and play more "diplomatic". There is a reason why Reikland is one of the most profitable regions in the game. "Help" your allies to stay alive, and reconquer their land if it is lost and the faction is dead to "replace" them. It is more "get tall and have allies to divide & conquer" instead of "i am the only one" wide gameplay. at least it is the more or less only faction that can go this way.
England having a civil war and France taking advantage of it because they have a claim to the throne is altogether different than what is happening in this game.
You have Chaos that literally just wants to corrupt and destroy the world, Norsca and Beastmen with similar goals, Greenskins that want to kill and eat everyone, Counts that mostly want everyone dead just to raise them as slaves, and Skaven that just want to be kings of the ashes.
Meanwhile, Empire is mad because these things are happening to them and decide why not just plunge the entire empire into even more chaos because they're incapable of doing anything on their own, or working together, but only against the player because fighting each other would be ridiculous, huh? And why does Gelt even have this mechanic? He's not the emperor. This is even more problematic because most of the time they refuse to give you access so you can stop these problems.
And I didn't say it was hard to overcome, so your thinly veiled "learn to play" comment is irrelevant. The mechanic itself is fine, the reasons for it happening though make no sense. It's artificial difficulty with no practical application.
To give a real world analogy it would be like the governor of California deciding that the President wasn't doing a good enough job and raising an army to lay siege to the White House with.
The thing to remember with the Empire is that it is not a singular unified country. It is a bunch of semi-independent states that nominally show fealty to the chosen emperor but will frequently ignore the emperor to do their own thing, up to an including declaring war on each other. The is pretty much how the Holy Roman Empire worked, including the infighting.
Just be patient, plenty of other factions to play as in the meantime.
Also from a lore perspective there was plenty of backstabbing and power plays from the elector counts and the emperor of the time that took place during the Skaven plague wars. Very nearly dooming the entire empire as a result. If the skaven didn't end up backstabbing each other as well it likely would have been the end of the empire.
Basically the emperor of the time and the elector counts couldn't see beyond their own interests, the fact that the empire as a whole could fall either didn't register with them, or they didn't care if it meant they would have to lose their own power to stop it (they rather put their heads down in the sand and pretended like everything was fine, hoping someone else would solve the issue).
Not to mention that unreliable information is a thing (doomsayers, false information made up by a rival, underestimating the issue, etc), so its not like they necessarily had a clear picture of the situation.
I wouldn't have huge expectations if i were you. The empire is getting a race update (not a rework) in said DLC, race updates thus far has been rather minor updates (see the 3 race updates in SoC as examples).
Still, you make a good point, and while the mechanic may have been implemented with the idea that they wouldn't be aware of those things, the loss of those counts leads to the gamey aspect of being attacked by all of them anyway.
These days, you've got Festus, Drycha, Vlad, Azhag, Grom, Heinrich, Kazrak, and the Changeling all at once and they are all going to be doing things, Morghur is GOING to be doing stuff and Ikit Claw might actually show up. These days, none of the Empire starts are actually safe or straightforward.
The biggest advantage the Empire has is that at least most of their enemies also hate each other.
Marketing line... "correct past mistake"
Yeah, that's kind of the main problem I'm getting at and why the Civil War just doesn't feel right.
Kinda/sorta. All the Chaos-esque factions end up liking each other, mostly because they're all attacking the same targets that they don't like. Khazrak, Wulfrik/Throgg, Festus, Changling, and Throt all tend to get along. Vlad, Heinrich and Azhag tend to get along, but they generally don't like chaos.
And if we're being fair, they should all declare war on each other too. Empirebowl.