Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Lazy mechanics for Cathay
lack luster units. Wow a Drum, and oh look yet another version of war hounds and fellbats.
Overpowered as all hell crossbow units for Kisliev. The gunners where already bad this just made sure you never have a need to use them.
One less legendary lord, 12 units total, one is a blatant reskin. Price vs what is on the table isn't there even if it was at a deeper discount.
Seriously stack this up vs Chaos Dwarves at the same price. One is clearly superior in what it offers at that price point, and doesn't even account for older DLC being at least as much as SoC and anywhere from 6-10 dollars each on sale.
It doesn't have the price vs benefit compared to any previous pack
A heavy focus on the DLCs which add major factions or entire races, weighted to some extent for value/money. Low ratings for DLCs which add minor content to portions of the game you already have access to and/or provide poor value/money
will state vampire coast didn't age well i think. Norsca although limited in lords and hero's feel way beter then VP.
hunter and the beast is C-tier max
Funny, because I explicitly remember people raging hard about Chorf DLC being "literally just copies and reskins of existing mechanics and units for $25" yet now it's mysteriously at the top of an arbitrary tier list. I guarantee once the next DLC drops the same will happen for SoC.
Also, Grim and Grave is also somehow better than SoC? Arguable the worst/bare bones DLC for this trilogy that took 5+ years to reach "meh" state only because they made some changes with the inclusion of IE? I don't think so.
If ToD does not include enough content to justify the absurd price than yes it will be treated as the worse one again.
I see no universe where SoC is ever even considered good. It provides nothing of value for the price of half the game. Notice how even you could not defend the unit choices and lazy mechanics for the lords?
Unit choices, lords, and mechanics are fantastic. I don't what you're on about. I've played more of SoC stuff than I have chorfs.
Look if the price is the biggest hurdle for you that's fine, but im talking about game play.
SoC F Tier while Champions of Chaos and Chaos Dwarfs are S Tier... "I see no universe where SoC is ever even considered good. It provides nothing of value for the price of half the game." The same can be said about Chaos Dwarfs. But mysteriously it's not one tier better, it is 5(!) tiers better. Seriously these two DLC should be 1 tier apart...
If you love SoC I would challenge you to explain why.
Where did I say I love it? I said Chaos Dwarfs and SoC are similiar content-wise. I played more of SoC than Chaos Dwarfs, because Chaos Dwarfs play all the same while in SoC you get 3 different Lords/factions. The Changeling offers you a totally unique playstyle. If you don't like SoC it's ok, but these two DLC shouldn't be 5 Tiers apart.
-Is the OG buy once-carry over.
-Affects all units and factions.
Why is it not at the top...
Feels like somebody is overrating them based on the rework there, especially considering you don't get the rework if you're playing it on WH1 or 2. And even if you are playing WH3 you get Be'lakor free anyway so you're really just paying for the 3 LLs. Definitely don't think it's worth being in A tier.