Anyone else feel like skaven weapons team doomstacks are worse in WH3 compared to WH2?

[[MAW] Jaeger]

As the title says. The weapons team doomstack simply feels worse. Way harder to get high ambush success chance, more physical resistance in enemies, AI building one man doomstacks with 70% missile resistance etc. I just feel that it is less viable in this game, do you agree with me?

[Fryskar]

Going from beyond godlike as skryre (vs ai) to brutally overpowered isn't exactly bad.
Barly anything unitwise can reach 70% MR.

[Eldi]

I don't, no.

[Defmonkey]

Nope.

[Enelith]

Originally posted by Jäger:

do you agree with me?

I'd like to agree with you, but we'd both be wrong.

[chickabumpbump]

I dont use doomstacks because boring

[Isaac]

There is no way the AI in this game builds doomstacks, let alone one man doomstacks with that much mis.res.

[SpeaksTooFast]

Have not played much skaven but the changes to cunning make it a bit harder to to crank you ambush success chance and ranged targeting generally performed better in the last game.

That being said the skaven are still fine and weapons teams can still wreck house. The META has just shifted a bit.

[DasaKamov]

Originally posted by Jäger:

Way harder to get high ambush success chance, more physical resistance in enemies, AI building one man doomstacks with 70% missile resistance etc.

These are all good things.