Total War: WARHAMMER III

Total War: WARHAMMER III

View Stats:
Someone using 7900XTX ?
Thinking about upgrading from a 3080 to a 7900XTX, 4080 offers nothing for TWW3 which I play 90% of the time, 4090 is absurdly pricey
With a 5900X and on Ultrawide 1440p, so I expect max performance/no GPU bottleneck, 3080 gives me 50-60 FPS in campaign on Ultra/High mix, not that high, tho it's ok in battles (80+)
What's your performances for you lucky people using that GPU ?
First world issue I reckon...
< >
Showing 1-15 of 39 comments
It's Shas Apr 12, 2023 @ 12:20pm 
Not going to argue against a 7900xtx which overall has a better performance per dollar spent ration compared to all Nvidia cards, but what do you mean a 4080 offers nothing for TWW3.
You also don't need a 7900xtx to get good performance on qhd.
I have the same performance you have but currently with a 2070, but I upgraded the rest of my rig mid last year. So maybe its actually not the GPU which is bottlenecking.
pascal.difolco Apr 12, 2023 @ 12:30pm 
Originally posted by It's Shas:
Not going to argue against a 7900xtx which overall has a better performance per dollar spent ration compared to all Nvidia cards, but what do you mean a 4080 offers nothing for TWW3.
You also don't need a 7900xtx to get good performance on qhd.
I have the same performance you have but currently with a 2070, but I upgraded the rest of my rig mid last year. So maybe its actually not the GPU which is bottlenecking.

Huh ? How can you have that much performance ? On ultra and "normal" 1440p, 2070 don't reach 50FPS in benchmarks, so will be low 40ish max in ultrawide
I'm hardly GPU bound so no other upgrade will help
I mean I don't need NVidia 4000 better performance in RT, and DLSS , as TWW3 don't use neither of them
Chef0Death88 Apr 12, 2023 @ 12:34pm 
i get 60-80 fps 1080p on ultra with a 2070, dont see the need to throw more money at my rig to enjoy this game tbh
and i run heavily modded and with reshade
Chrenergros Apr 12, 2023 @ 1:05pm 
Originally posted by pascal.difolco:
Thinking about upgrading from a 3080 to a 7900XTX, 4080 offers nothing for TWW3 which I play 90% of the time, 4090 is absurdly pricey
With a 5900X and on Ultrawide 1440p, so I expect max performance/no GPU bottleneck, 3080 gives me 50-60 FPS in campaign on Ultra/High mix, not that high, tho it's ok in battles (80+)
What's your performances for you lucky people using that GPU ?
First world issue I reckon...
What 3080 is? 10gb or 12gb?i have the 12gb and with an i7 12700k i have all maxed in 1440p with 80fps average on both campaign and battle...
pascal.difolco Apr 12, 2023 @ 1:13pm 
Originally posted by Chrenergros:
Originally posted by pascal.difolco:
Thinking about upgrading from a 3080 to a 7900XTX, 4080 offers nothing for TWW3 which I play 90% of the time, 4090 is absurdly pricey
With a 5900X and on Ultrawide 1440p, so I expect max performance/no GPU bottleneck, 3080 gives me 50-60 FPS in campaign on Ultra/High mix, not that high, tho it's ok in battles (80+)
What's your performances for you lucky people using that GPU ?
First world issue I reckon...
What 3080 is? 10gb or 12gb?i have the 12gb and with an i7 12700k i have all maxed in 1440p with 80fps average on both campaign and battle...

It's a 10GB one and Ultrawide has 30% more pixels so reduced fps
Maybe I'm using a bit too many graphics mods, plus reshade that also reduce framerate, but it's consistent imo
Captain Baldy Apr 12, 2023 @ 1:16pm 
Originally posted by Chef0Death88:
i get 60-80 fps 1080p on ultra with a 2070, dont see the need to throw more money at my rig to enjoy this game tbh
and i run heavily modded and with reshade

I'm getting similar framerates on a 1080. its all about the tweaking and settings in my opinion
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2961186064
Last edited by Captain Baldy; Apr 12, 2023 @ 1:19pm
pascal.difolco Apr 12, 2023 @ 1:21pm 
Originally posted by flange:
Originally posted by Chef0Death88:
i get 60-80 fps 1080p on ultra with a 2070, dont see the need to throw more money at my rig to enjoy this game tbh
and i run heavily modded and with reshade

I'm getting similar framerates on a 1080. its all about the tweaking and settings in my opinion

Ok guys, I'm sure I can get 250FPS at 720p low lol, but my question was about what's people experience with a 7900XTX ^^
Chrenergros Apr 12, 2023 @ 1:29pm 
Originally posted by pascal.difolco:
Originally posted by Chrenergros:
What 3080 is? 10gb or 12gb?i have the 12gb and with an i7 12700k i have all maxed in 1440p with 80fps average on both campaign and battle...

It's a 10GB one and Ultrawide has 30% more pixels so reduced fps
Maybe I'm using a bit too many graphics mods, plus reshade that also reduce framerate, but it's consistent imo
You are out of VRAM. In a 16:9, 1440p my game uses 9,8gb of VRAM, imagine having more pixels and reshades and ONLY 10gb VRAM. This is your issue, with the 12gb version you will be fine.

So to answer to you: obviously with a recent GPU with more VRAM you will have better fps. I'm just saying that you do not need a 7900XTX to max the graphic in this game.
Last edited by Chrenergros; Apr 12, 2023 @ 1:32pm
pascal.difolco Apr 12, 2023 @ 1:35pm 
Originally posted by Chrenergros:
Originally posted by pascal.difolco:

It's a 10GB one and Ultrawide has 30% more pixels so reduced fps
Maybe I'm using a bit too many graphics mods, plus reshade that also reduce framerate, but it's consistent imo
You are out of VRAM. In a 16:9, 1440p my game uses 9,8gb of VRAM, imagine having more pixels and reshades and ONLY 10gb VRAM. This is your issue, with the 12gb version you will be fine.

So to answer to you: obviously with a recent GPU with more VRAM you will have better fps. I'm just saying that you do not need a 7900XTX to max the graphic in this game.

Yeah figured VRAM is too small, but got it early and 12GB version didn't exist
Thing is there's not much point upgrading to anything less than a 7900XTX or 4080 because it won't give noticeable enough gains, those will give +50% approx (from benchmarks)
Khorne Flakes Apr 12, 2023 @ 1:39pm 
Just go for it, it is a great choice for your needs.
Chrenergros Apr 12, 2023 @ 1:40pm 
Originally posted by pascal.difolco:
Originally posted by Chrenergros:
You are out of VRAM. In a 16:9, 1440p my game uses 9,8gb of VRAM, imagine having more pixels and reshades and ONLY 10gb VRAM. This is your issue, with the 12gb version you will be fine.

So to answer to you: obviously with a recent GPU with more VRAM you will have better fps. I'm just saying that you do not need a 7900XTX to max the graphic in this game.

Yeah figured VRAM is too small, but got it early and 12GB version didn't exist
Thing is there's not much point upgrading to anything less than a 7900XTX or 4080 because it won't give noticeable enough gains, those will give +50% approx (from benchmarks)
U'll be fine then with the 7900XTX. If I have all maxed with a 3080 12gb, with 80fps on both campaign and battle, you could expect even more with a 7900XTX. Amd is better when you're not planning to use DLSS and RT games.
Last edited by Chrenergros; Apr 12, 2023 @ 1:41pm
Caldrin Apr 12, 2023 @ 1:44pm 
My specs as follows

CPU: AMD 7700x
RAM: 32GB DDR5
GPI: AMD 7900xtx by XFX
OS: Win 11 on fast NVME
Game: On Fast NVME
Resolution: 3840x1600


In game battle benchmark gets average fps of 90 with highs of 113 and lows of 67 when tons is going on. Everything maxed out.. If I pop tree and grass detail down a bit, turn off screen space shadows and SSAO its like an extra 15fps average in the benchmark.

Campaign benchmark is an average of 77fps if that matters at all :)

So with a 1440p ultrawide you would prob see slightly higher results as well.

Card is really solid I also upgraded from a 3080 10Gb and for me was well worth it.
Last edited by Caldrin; Apr 12, 2023 @ 1:46pm
pascal.difolco Apr 12, 2023 @ 1:50pm 
Originally posted by Caldrin:
My specs as follows

CPU: AMD 7700x
RAM: 32GB DDR5
GPI: AMD 7900xtx by XFX
OS: Win 11 on fast NVME
Game: On Fast NVME
Resolution: 3840x1600


In game battle benchmark gets average fps of 90 with highs of 113 and lows of 67 when tons is going on. Everything maxed out.. If I pop tree and grass detail down a bit, turn off screen space shadows and SSAO its like an extra 15fps average in the benchmark.

Campaign benchmark is an average of 77fps if that matters at all :)

So with a 1440p ultrawide you would prob see slightly higher results as well.

Card is really solid I also upgraded from a 3080 10Gb and for me was well worth it.

That's good !
What about the XFX card ? Read it has super good perf and temps but some people whine about coil whine, and I'm hesistating between the XFX and the ASUS TUF, both costing same 1200EUR now
TheAlmightyProo Apr 12, 2023 @ 2:43pm 
Originally posted by Chrenergros:
Originally posted by pascal.difolco:

It's a 10GB one and Ultrawide has 30% more pixels so reduced fps
Maybe I'm using a bit too many graphics mods, plus reshade that also reduce framerate, but it's consistent imo
You are out of VRAM. In a 16:9, 1440p my game uses 9,8gb of VRAM, imagine having more pixels and reshades and ONLY 10gb VRAM. This is your issue, with the 12gb version you will be fine.

So to answer to you: obviously with a recent GPU with more VRAM you will have better fps. I'm just saying that you do not need a 7900XTX to max the graphic in this game.

One of the main reasons I picked 6800XT over the 3080 10Gb available at the time. I've had 12Gb used at 3440x1440 ultra settings (and there's other games that have used 14Gb)

As for the 7900XTX, I don't have one but I've been looking a lot as if I did upgrade this gen (for the sake of all games plus longevity going forward) so that (and 20+Gb) would be the one. Afaik perf at 3440x1440 should be at least 100 fps ultra, going by a variety of benchmarks, instead of the 60 or so I get now.
Caldrin Apr 12, 2023 @ 3:54pm 
Originally posted by pascal.difolco:
Originally posted by Caldrin:
My specs as follows

CPU: AMD 7700x
RAM: 32GB DDR5
GPI: AMD 7900xtx by XFX
OS: Win 11 on fast NVME
Game: On Fast NVME
Resolution: 3840x1600


In game battle benchmark gets average fps of 90 with highs of 113 and lows of 67 when tons is going on. Everything maxed out.. If I pop tree and grass detail down a bit, turn off screen space shadows and SSAO its like an extra 15fps average in the benchmark.

Campaign benchmark is an average of 77fps if that matters at all :)

So with a 1440p ultrawide you would prob see slightly higher results as well.

Card is really solid I also upgraded from a 3080 10Gb and for me was well worth it.

That's good !
What about the XFX card ? Read it has super good perf and temps but some people whine about coil whine, and I'm hesistating between the XFX and the ASUS TUF, both costing same 1200EUR now


Its a great card so far.. Good temps so far and only get coil whine if the fps in a game goes over 500fps haha and that does not really happen in modern games..

Not really seen much about the Asus Tuf version but have had TUF cards before my 3080 was and was also very solid.. I dont think you could go wrong with either..
< >
Showing 1-15 of 39 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Apr 12, 2023 @ 12:12pm
Posts: 39