Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yeah this is one of the biggest problems i have with IE. You just leapfrog from town to town, there just is not enough space between towns. This became really noticeable when minor settlements were always engaged and there being so few land battles.... they have got around that now by having these being far less common. Still, its all very squashed in. Either that or slow movement down so that field engagements can be a thing over bait and ambush every time.
It's not necessarily a bad thing, but I personally use various mods to increase the survivability of minor factions.
- Athel Loren, 2-3x more regions, movement points/speed greatly decreased for everyone except beastmen & wood elves
- Albion, either physically enlarged or left as it is, but with 2-3x more regions as well + plus movement penalties
- more islands (and vamp coast factions)
- Southlands and Lustria are utterly boring, imho they should be remade
- and so on
The world map is missing big Lustrian swamps, just like the Old World is missing Mirror Moors. It could use more unique gameplay-wise (not just visual-wise) regions that slow down, hamper or hurt all or nearly all passing armies. IE needs toggleable Chaos rifts, too.
Reducing movement points would probably make the IE a huge slog, so against that idea... but maybe as a customisable world/campaign setting/config, it would be a great boon.
+1, Lord
The immediate, obvious problem is that the game already struggles a bit with the map if you run it at full options, and since a lot of players (me included) do not realize it's possible to run it at less than epic, there would be some slowdown. Also, it's a lot of work. Still, the empire, for instance, now (with 4.0) has Vlad, kemmler, orcs, festus, changeling and khazrak as immediate enemies either at their borders or 1-2 regions removed. (unless they move khazrak off a bit. They could do that.). That's... a bit much.
It's never sat right with me on those campaigns that you're encouraged to take out another LL within the first 10-20 turns or they become a constant annoyance. I think it's worst with Mannfred's start pos now. I was excited at the idea of a big struggle between him and Volkmar but I feel whichever you play you got to take the other out as fast as possible. Especially as Settra is ready to mess Mannfred's capital up. If anywhere could get a bit more space, for me it'd be that region.
What's baffling to me is that the map is already this crowded and then they have the brilliant idea to make the COC DLC that adds 4 more. 4 more for a faction that already had 3. Insane.
it was actually 5 because they added be'lakor for free on top ^^
Be'lakor is daemons of chaos I think?
That they expand the map from 1->2->3 is hardly surprising since they're centered on different parts of the world. Unfortunately, as there's no #4 in the works, the map stays the same but every update will add 3 LL's to the world. It will be more crowded unless they do something (TM).