Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Monkey king vs Changeling has been hinted at since before the game even released. Plus the monkey king is stupidly popular in China. Personally I'm not a fan, never have been, so I'm glad it's somebody else, but a lot of people would've been more than happy to pay for monkey king DLC so CA making that makes sense from a business perspective (I fully expect it's still going to happen, just at a later date now).
Also, FYI would doesn't have an h in it.
On-top of that the two in-game loading screen prompts referencing this rivalry; like the Changeling taking different forms to misrepresent the Monkey King across Cathay. Was the strongest possible guess for who the Lord would be, and I think CA or GW chickened out of doing him first and instead went for a "safe" option in Yuan Bo, who looks awesome, but he's just another Dragon and I'll just be playing Zhao Ming again.
but they already announced that we would get 3 lords, how does that work with a rivalry?
I'm not exactly salty that we have another Dragon now, and it's not the worst misstep or lost opportunity for CA or the game tbh. I haven't yet got into Cathay anyway as not fleshed out enough for me (yet) but a different LL template for them rn would've been better, even without considering lore aso. Let's hope we get LL Monkeh later then.
As for being 'paired' with The Changeling, I don't know enough about that lore so remain ambivalent.
yes they could have 2 characters have a rivalry with just 1 other character would not be nearly as interesting. it would also be very very weird because that would essentially put 2 of the lords in the backseat with 1 lord being the main focus, after all it would mean that you are focussing on that lords rivalry with others.
It's already been said by CA that GW does not intend for her fate to ever be revealed. She is meant to be a mystery, not ever a playable character.
The other recent example is all the folks getting mad that Pharaoh is not a Medieval II sequel.
Nothing new to see here at all, and completely predictable
Rule of three and all that.