rtx4090 Performance.

[Napoleon slice]

Anybody playing on that card? I'm curious to know how much better the game runs opposed to a 3080, presuming you're enjoying it.

I could check youtube but I won't.

[Imposter]

Originally posted by Napoleon slice:

Thank's all. I think my 3080 can still keep it's chin up with the 4090 now a reality. Perhaps the next TW game will be built on a new engine where performance will really take off.

There will always be a better card than the last. You certainly arent missing much, except playing more comfortably in 4k. There's always time for better stuff, and time is against people who bought the last gen starting with the 4090, and worsens the older the last gens are, because the next iteration will be better than the last.

All of it is too expensive for me right now. Because I only have a 1440p monitor on a 3090ti... The card cannot perform to its full potential without 4k settings, 4k monitor, and my CPU. Which is an 8700k ... That's a bit long in the tooth. The only trick is: Do I want to pony up about $3,000 for mobo, ram, and CPU?.. Plus another $700-$1,000 on a monitor? Not necessarily for me right now, most certainly should if I had the 4090, using an 8700k.

Just save your money and treat yourself later. That's what I say to myself.

[Eldi]

Originally posted by chickabumpbump:

Originally posted by Adelleise:

I also using RTX 4090 with Ryzen 7900X. In the campaign map, I checked the frame rate stable.. but in battle map after starting the battle, eventually GPU load decreased to 20-30 % so that the frame rate also going down (20-30 fps). Idk wtf is the reason of this happening... I cannot solve..

Because its a badly made lazy game where CA care about selling you lord packs

But your buying the next dlc right?

[chickabumpbump]

Originally posted by Eldi:

Originally posted by chickabumpbump:

Because its a badly made lazy game where CA care about selling you lord packs

But your buying the next dlc right?

If its Chaos Dwarfs yes, if its anything else no. It wont cost me anything anyway, i use MS reward points

[Captain T1]

Originally posted by chickabumpbump:

Originally posted by Eldi:

But your buying the next dlc right?

If its Chaos Dwarfs yes, if its anything else no. It wont cost me anything anyway, i use MS reward points

Do you use a bot to farm points?

[chickabumpbump]

Originally posted by Captain T1:

Originally posted by chickabumpbump:

If its Chaos Dwarfs yes, if its anything else no. It wont cost me anything anyway, i use MS reward points

Do you use a bot to farm points?

No, only takes 10 minutes to do web, phone and xbox ones. I have 2 accounts. I do the phone ones on the train home from work.

Im getting Dead space remake on xbox for half price, never had to buy xbox gamepass once or xbox live, I get a fair amount of press codes due to a friend who does reviews and some old mates in the industry too, cant remember last time I ever spend real money on a game.
I would recommend MS rewards to everyone even if youre not an xbox gamer.

[Eldi]

Originally posted by chickabumpbump:

Originally posted by Eldi:

But your buying the next dlc right?

If its Chaos Dwarfs yes, if its anything else no. It wont cost me anything anyway, i use MS reward points

But you see the irony in what've you've said right?

[chickabumpbump]

Originally posted by Eldi:

Originally posted by chickabumpbump:

If its Chaos Dwarfs yes, if its anything else no. It wont cost me anything anyway, i use MS reward points

But you see the irony in what've you've said right?

No nothing I said was Ironic, me buying or not buying any DLC doesnt affect that I think DLC is all they care about when it comes to quality assurance, something that is OBVIOUS to anyone who has worked in QA or taken 5 minutes without Warhammer blinkers on to see what an average game this is.

That's not irony, you can claim its hypocritical at a stretch but thats also incorrect.

I expected a yank to not understand Irony but not a Brit, Stop listening to Sheryl Crow

[Eldi]

Originally posted by chickabumpbump:

Originally posted by Eldi:

But you see the irony in what've you've said right?

No nothing I said was Ironic, me buying or not buying any DLC doesnt affect that I think DLC is all they care about when it comes to quality assurance, something that is OBVIOUS to anyone who has worked in QA or taken 5 minutes without Warhammer blinkers on to see what an average game this is.

That's not irony, you can claim its hypocritical at a stretch but thats also incorrect.

I expected a yank to not understand Irony but not a Brit, Stop listening to Sheryl Crow

The irony is your saying they are lazy devs as they only make DLC rather than fixing things.

But whats the incentive to increase QA standards when DLC will get them more profit and attention?
They are better spent putting more resource into the DLC and making it "as good as can be" for launch, than refactor old code that's "ok" (well, not getting worse)


If your acquiring said DLC.. then they are catering to you...
Irony was probably a poor choice like you say but you get the point.

Also anyone who's worked in QA knows, they can't find ALL the problems no matter how much time they spend on it. The nature of the beast.

[Chrenergros]

This game use the CPU a lot. Like, in 1440p with EVERYTHING at max (even shadows on extreme) I get 72fps in campaign map (Immortal Empires) because my i7 12700k reach his maximum power with a single core (100% usage) and I have a 3080 12gb, tuf gaming oc version (gpu usage at 80%).

With a better CPU I could reach higher fps with the same GPU. What really change is in the battle map where I reach 80-90 fps with a 100% gpu usage, so there a 4090 will make a good difference.

[pascal.difolco]

Originally posted by Chrenergros:

This game use the CPU a lot. Like, in 1440p with EVERYTHING at max (even shadows on extreme) I get 72fps in campaign map (Immortal Empires) because my i7 12700k reach his maximum power with a single core (100% usage) and I have a 3080 12gb, tuf gaming oc version (gpu usage at 80%).

With a better CPU I could reach higher fps with the same GPU. What really change is in the battle map where I reach 80-90 fps with a 100% gpu usage, so there a 4090 will make a good difference.

Same here (5900X/3080), but you won't get anything more with a better CPU, you're GPU limited
A 4090 may lead you to CPU bottleneck tho

[Chrenergros]

Originally posted by pascal.difolco:

Originally posted by Chrenergros:

This game use the CPU a lot. Like, in 1440p with EVERYTHING at max (even shadows on extreme) I get 72fps in campaign map (Immortal Empires) because my i7 12700k reach his maximum power with a single core (100% usage) and I have a 3080 12gb, tuf gaming oc version (gpu usage at 80%).

With a better CPU I could reach higher fps with the same GPU. What really change is in the battle map where I reach 80-90 fps with a 100% gpu usage, so there a 4090 will make a good difference.

Same here (5900X/3080), but you won't get anything more with a better CPU, you're GPU limited
A 4090 may lead you to CPU bottleneck tho

In campaign map yes, I'm CPU limited because one core reach 100% usage, limiting my fps at 72, while GPU is at 80%. When a single core reach his maximum power, you are CPU limited.
In battle map I'm gpu limited instead because I have 100% gpu usage, while my single core is at max 50-65%.

[Mazisky]

Originally posted by Chrenergros:

Originally posted by pascal.difolco:

Same here (5900X/3080), but you won't get anything more with a better CPU, you're GPU limited
A 4090 may lead you to CPU bottleneck tho

In campaign map yes, I'm CPU limited because one core reach 100% usage, limiting my fps at 72, while GPU is at 80%. When a single core reach his maximum power, you are CPU limited.
In battle map I'm gpu limited instead because I have 100% gpu usage, while my single core is at max 50-65%.

Also battles are more unpredictable. I think if you play 20 skaven units vs 20 skaven units you will get 100% CPU aswell

[Chrenergros]

Originally posted by Mazisky:

Originally posted by Chrenergros:

In campaign map yes, I'm CPU limited because one core reach 100% usage, limiting my fps at 72, while GPU is at 80%. When a single core reach his maximum power, you are CPU limited.
In battle map I'm gpu limited instead because I have 100% gpu usage, while my single core is at max 50-65%.

Also battles are more unpredictable. I think if you play 20 skaven units vs 20 skaven units you will get 100% CPU aswell

Yes, the more units, the more CPU load but to let my CPU go at 100% in battle, i need to do a 40vs40.

[Android Poetry]

It runs great on my 4090 but it doesn't change much, just better FPS. It's not the sort of game that requires 150 fps vs 60 fps to enjoy.